This file is indexed.

/usr/lib/R/site-library/acepack/LICENSE is in r-cran-acepack 1.3.3.3-1.

This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.

The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
For the AVAS license, see README.avas.

The following, concerning ACE, written by Tom "spot" Callaway, is from
the Fedora R-acepack RPM.

########################
The copyright on the ace implementation was clear, but its licensing 
terms were not. I was able to clarify the terms with the copyright holder:

Copyright 2007 Jerome H. Friedman

Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and
its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee,
provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that
both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
supporting documentation. No representations are made about the
suitability of this software for any purpose.  It is provided "as is"
without express or implied warranty.

=========================================================================
To remove any hint of impropriety, here are copies of my email 
communications with the copyright holder.

From: "Jerome H. Friedman" <jhf@stanford.edu>
To: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: license for ace()
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:05:10 -0800

Tom,

>> > We would like to include it in Fedora, but we need to know the 
>> > licensing
>> > terms for that code.
>>
>> Sorry for my ignorance, but what is Fedora?
>
> Fedora is a very popular distribution of Linux. Our previous name was
> "Red Hat Linux".

Right. I should have remembered that.

You hereby have my permission to distribute my ACE code in Fedora.

Cheers,

Jerry.

From tcallawa@redhat.com Wed Oct 31 15:10:12 2007
Subject: Re: license for ace()
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@redhat.com>
To: "Jerome H. Friedman" <jhf@stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:10:12 -0400

On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:05 -0800, Jerome H. Friedman wrote:
> Tom,
> 
> >> > We would like to include it in Fedora, but we need to know the 
> >> > licensing
> >> > terms for that code.
> >>
> >> Sorry for my ignorance, but what is Fedora?
> >
> > Fedora is a very popular distribution of Linux. Our previous name was
> > "Red Hat Linux".
> 
> Right. I should have remembered that.
> 
> You hereby have my permission to distribute my ACE code in Fedora.

Great! Now, I just need to know under what licensing terms we can
distribute it under. :)

Here are several common licenses:

MIT
====
Copyright 19XX John Doe <jdoe@nowhere.com>

Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and
its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee,
provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that
both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
supporting documentation. No representations are made about the
suitability of this software for any purpose.  It is provided "as is"
without express or implied warranty.

BSD
====
Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>

All rights reserved.

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, 
are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:

   * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this 
     list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
   * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, 
     this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation 
     and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
   * Neither the name of the <ORGANIZATION> nor the names of its contributors 
     may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software 
     without specific prior written permission.

THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND ANY 
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED 
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE 
DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY 
DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES 
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; 
LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON 
ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT 
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS 
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.


GPLv2
======
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html

If none of those licenses seems correct to you, let me know, and I will
show you some others.

Thanks,

~Tom

From: "Jerome H. Friedman" <jhf@stanford.edu>
To: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: license for ace()
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:43:34 -0800

Tom,

> MIT
> ====
> Copyright 19XX John Doe <jdoe@nowhere.com>
> 
> Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and
> its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee,
> provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that
> both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
> supporting documentation. No representations are made about the
> suitability of this software for any purpose.  It is provided "as is"
> without express or implied warranty.

I think this is good enough.

Jerry.