This file is indexed.

/usr/include/llvm-3.9/llvm/Analysis/LoopUnrollAnalyzer.h is in llvm-3.9-dev 1:3.9.1-19ubuntu1.

This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.

The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
//===- llvm/Analysis/LoopUnrollAnalyzer.h - Loop Unroll Analyzer-*- C++ -*-===//
//
//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements UnrolledInstAnalyzer class. It's used for predicting
// potential effects that loop unrolling might have, such as enabling constant
// propagation and other optimizations.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

#ifndef LLVM_ANALYSIS_LOOPUNROLLANALYZER_H
#define LLVM_ANALYSIS_LOOPUNROLLANALYZER_H

#include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h"
#include "llvm/IR/InstVisitor.h"

// This class is used to get an estimate of the optimization effects that we
// could get from complete loop unrolling. It comes from the fact that some
// loads might be replaced with concrete constant values and that could trigger
// a chain of instruction simplifications.
//
// E.g. we might have:
//   int a[] = {0, 1, 0};
//   v = 0;
//   for (i = 0; i < 3; i ++)
//     v += b[i]*a[i];
// If we completely unroll the loop, we would get:
//   v = b[0]*a[0] + b[1]*a[1] + b[2]*a[2]
// Which then will be simplified to:
//   v = b[0]* 0 + b[1]* 1 + b[2]* 0
// And finally:
//   v = b[1]
namespace llvm {
class UnrolledInstAnalyzer : private InstVisitor<UnrolledInstAnalyzer, bool> {
  typedef InstVisitor<UnrolledInstAnalyzer, bool> Base;
  friend class InstVisitor<UnrolledInstAnalyzer, bool>;
  struct SimplifiedAddress {
    Value *Base = nullptr;
    ConstantInt *Offset = nullptr;
  };

public:
  UnrolledInstAnalyzer(unsigned Iteration,
                       DenseMap<Value *, Constant *> &SimplifiedValues,
                       ScalarEvolution &SE, const Loop *L)
      : SimplifiedValues(SimplifiedValues), SE(SE), L(L) {
      IterationNumber = SE.getConstant(APInt(64, Iteration));
  }

  // Allow access to the initial visit method.
  using Base::visit;

private:
  /// \brief A cache of pointer bases and constant-folded offsets corresponding
  /// to GEP (or derived from GEP) instructions.
  ///
  /// In order to find the base pointer one needs to perform non-trivial
  /// traversal of the corresponding SCEV expression, so it's good to have the
  /// results saved.
  DenseMap<Value *, SimplifiedAddress> SimplifiedAddresses;

  /// \brief SCEV expression corresponding to number of currently simulated
  /// iteration.
  const SCEV *IterationNumber;

  /// \brief A Value->Constant map for keeping values that we managed to
  /// constant-fold on the given iteration.
  ///
  /// While we walk the loop instructions, we build up and maintain a mapping
  /// of simplified values specific to this iteration.  The idea is to propagate
  /// any special information we have about loads that can be replaced with
  /// constants after complete unrolling, and account for likely simplifications
  /// post-unrolling.
  DenseMap<Value *, Constant *> &SimplifiedValues;

  ScalarEvolution &SE;
  const Loop *L;

  bool simplifyInstWithSCEV(Instruction *I);

  bool visitInstruction(Instruction &I) { return simplifyInstWithSCEV(&I); }
  bool visitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperator &I);
  bool visitLoad(LoadInst &I);
  bool visitCastInst(CastInst &I);
  bool visitCmpInst(CmpInst &I);
  bool visitPHINode(PHINode &PN);
};
}
#endif