/usr/share/help/el/programming-guidelines/c-coding-style.page is in gnome-devel-docs 3.28.0-1.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<page xmlns="http://projectmallard.org/1.0/" xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its" type="topic" id="c-coding-style" xml:lang="el">
<info>
<link type="guide" xref="index#general-guidelines"/>
<credit type="author copyright">
<name>Federico Mena-Quintero</name>
<email its:translate="no">federico@gnome.org</email>
<years>2013</years>
</credit>
<credit type="author copyright">
<name>Η ομάδα GTK+</name>
</credit>
<include xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" href="cc-by-sa-3-0.xml"/>
<desc>Οι οδηγίες μας για κώδικα C στο GNOME</desc>
<mal:credit xmlns:mal="http://projectmallard.org/1.0/" type="translator copyright">
<mal:name>Ελληνική μεταφραστική ομάδα GNOME</mal:name>
<mal:email>team@gnome.gr</mal:email>
<mal:years>2016</mal:years>
</mal:credit>
<mal:credit xmlns:mal="http://projectmallard.org/1.0/" type="translator copyright">
<mal:name>Θάνος Τρυφωνίδης</mal:name>
<mal:email>tomtryf@gnome.org</mal:email>
<mal:years>2016</mal:years>
</mal:credit>
</info>
<title>Στυλ κώδικα C</title>
<p>
This document presents the preferred coding style for C programs
in GNOME. While coding style is very much a matter of taste, in
GNOME we favor a coding style that promotes consistency,
readability, and maintainability.
</p>
<p>
We present examples of good coding style as well as examples of
bad style that is not acceptable in GNOME. Please try to submit
patches that conform to GNOME’s coding style; this indicates that
you have done your homework to respect the project’s goal of
long-term maintainability. Patches with GNOME’s coding style will
also be easier to review!
</p>
<note>
<p>
This document is for C code. For other languages, check the
<link xref="index">main page</link> of the GNOME Programming
Guidelines.
</p>
</note>
<p>
These guidelines are heavily inspired by GTK’s CODING-STYLE
document, the Linux Kernel’s CodingStyle, and the GNU Coding
Standards. These are slight variations of each other, with
particular modifications for each project’s particular needs and
culture, and GNOME’s version is no different.
</p>
<section id="most-important-rule">
<title>The Single Most Important Rule</title>
<p>
The single most important rule when writing code is this:
<em>check the surrounding code and try to imitate it</em>.
</p>
<p>
As a maintainer it is dismaying to receive a patch that is
obviously in a different coding style to the surrounding code.
This is disrespectful, like someone tromping into a spotlessly-clean
house with muddy shoes.
</p>
<p>
So, whatever this document recommends, if there is already
written code and you are patching it, keep its current style
consistent even if it is not your favorite style.
</p>
</section>
<section id="line-width">
<title>Πλάτος γραμμής</title>
<p>
Try to use lines of code between 80 and 120 characters long.
This amount of text is easy to fit in most monitors with a
decent font size. Lines longer than that become hard to read,
and they mean that you should probably restructure your code.
If you have too many levels of indentation, it means that you
should fix your code anyway.
</p>
</section>
<section id="indentation">
<title>Εσοχή</title>
<p>Γενικά υπάρχουν δύο προτεινόμενα στυλ εσοχής κώδικα για το GNOME.</p>
<list type="ordered">
<item>
<p>Το στυλ Linux Kernel. Στηλοθέτες με μήκος 8 χαρακτήρων για εσοχή, με τοποθέτηση αγκίστρων K&R:</p>
<code style="valid">
for (i = 0; i < num_elements; i++) {
foo[i] = foo[i] + 42;
if (foo[i] < 35) {
printf ("Foo!");
foo[i]--;
} else {
printf ("Bar!");
foo[i]++;
}
}</code>
</item>
<item>
<p>
GNU style. Each new level is indented by 2 spaces,
braces go on a line by themselves, and they are indented as
well.
</p>
<code style="valid">
for (i = 0; i < num_elements; i++)
{
foo[i] = foo[i] + 42;
if (foo[i] < 35)
{
printf ("Foo!");
foo[i]--;
}
else
{
printf ("Bar!");
foo[i]++;
}
}</code>
</item>
</list>
<p>
Both styles have their pros and cons. The most important things
is to <em>be consistent</em> with the surrounding code. For
example, the GTK+ library, which is GNOME’s widget toolkit, is
written with the GNU style. Nautilus, GNOME’s file manager, is
written in Linux kernel style. Both styles are perfectly
readable and consistent when you get used to them.
</p>
<p>
Your first feeling when having to study or work on a piece of
code that doesn’t have your preferred indentation style may be,
how shall we put it, gut-wrenching. You should resist your
inclination to reindent everything, or to use an inconsistent
style for your patch. Remember the first rule: <em>be
consistent</em> and respectful of that code’s customs, and your
patches will have a much higher chance of being accepted without
a lot of arguing about the right indentation style.
</p>
</section>
<section id="tab-characters">
<title>Χαρακτήρες στηλοθέτη</title>
<p>
<em>Do not ever change the size of tabs in your editor</em>;
leave them as 8 spaces. Changing the size of tabs means that
code that you didn’t write yourself will be perpetually misaligned.
</p>
<p>
Instead, set the <em>indentation size</em> as appropriate for
the code you are editing. When writing in something other than
Linux kernel style, you may even want to tell your editor to
automatically convert all tabs to 8 spaces, so that there is no
ambiguity about the intended amount of space.
</p>
</section>
<section id="braces">
<title>Braces</title>
<p>
Curly braces should not be used for single statement blocks:
</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid */
if (condition)
single_statement ();
else
another_single_statement (arg1);</code>
<p>
The “no block for single statements” rule has only four
exceptions:
</p>
<list type="ordered">
<item>
<p>
In GNU style, if either side of an if-else statement has
braces, both sides should, to match up indentation:
</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid GNU style */
if (condition)
{
foo ();
bar ();
}
else
{
baz ();
}</code>
<code style="invalid">
/* invalid */
if (condition)
{
foo ();
bar ();
}
else
baz ();</code>
</item>
<item>
<p>
If the single statement covers multiple lines, e.g. for functions with
many arguments, and it is followed by <code>else</code> or
<code>else if</code>:
</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid Linux kernel style */
if (condition) {
a_single_statement_with_many_arguments (some_lengthy_argument,
another_lengthy_argument,
and_another_one,
plus_one);
} else
another_single_statement (arg1, arg2);
/* valid GNU style */
if (condition)
{
a_single_statement_with_many_arguments (some_lengthy_argument,
another_lengthy_argument,
and_another_one,
plus_one);
}
else
{
another_single_statement (arg1, arg2);
}</code>
</item>
<item>
<p>
If the condition is composed of many lines:
</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid Linux kernel style */
if (condition1 ||
(condition2 && condition3) ||
condition4 ||
(condition5 && (condition6 || condition7))) {
a_single_statement ();
}
/* valid GNU style */
if (condition1 ||
(condition2 && condition3) ||
condition4 ||
(condition5 && (condition6 || condition7)))
{
a_single_statement ();
}</code>
<p>
Note that such long conditions are usually hard to understand. A
good practice is to set the condition to a boolean variable, with
a good name for that variable. Another way is to move the long
condition to a function.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Nested <code>if</code>s, in which case the block should be placed
on the outermost <code>if</code>:
</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid Linux kernel style */
if (condition) {
if (another_condition)
single_statement ();
else
another_single_statement ();
}
/* valid GNU style */
if (condition)
{
if (another_condition)
single_statement ();
else
another_single_statement ();
}</code>
<code style="invalid">
/* invalid */
if (condition)
if (another_condition)
single_statement ();
else if (yet_another_condition)
another_single_statement ();</code>
</item>
</list>
<p>
In general, new blocks should be placed on a new indentation level,
like this:
</p>
<code style="valid">
int retval = 0;
statement_1 ();
statement_2 ();
{
int var1 = 42;
gboolean res = FALSE;
res = statement_3 (var1);
retval = res ? -1 : 1;
}</code>
<p>
While curly braces for function definitions should rest on a
new line they should not add an indentation level:
</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid Linux kernel style*/
static void
my_function (int argument)
{
do_my_things ();
}
/* valid GNU style*/
static void
my_function (int argument)
{
do_my_things ();
}</code>
<code style="invalid">
/* invalid */
static void
my_function (int argument) {
do_my_things ();
}
/* invalid */
static void
my_function (int argument)
{
do_my_things ();
}</code>
</section>
<section id="conditions">
<title>Συνθήκες</title>
<p>
Do not check boolean values for equality. By using implicit
comparisons, the resulting code can be read more like conversational
English. Another rationale is that a ‘true’ value may not be necessarily
equal to whatever the <code>TRUE</code> macro uses. For example:
</p>
<code style="invalid">
/* invalid */
if (found == TRUE)
do_foo ();
/* invalid */
if (found == FALSE)
do_bar ();</code>
<code style="valid">
/* valid */
if (found)
do_foo ();
/* valid */
if (!found)
do_bar ();</code>
<p>
The C language uses the value 0 for many purposes. As a numeric value,
the end of a string, a null pointer and the <code>FALSE</code> boolean.
To make the code clearer, you should write code that highlights the
specific way 0 is used. So when reading a comparison, it is possible to
know the variable type. For boolean variables, an implicit comparison is
appropriate because it’s already a logical expression. Other variable
types are not logical expressions by themselves, so an explicit
comparison is better:
</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid */
if (some_pointer == NULL)
do_blah ();
/* valid */
if (number == 0)
do_foo ();
/* valid */
if (str != NULL && *str != '\0')
do_bar ();</code>
<code style="invalid">
/* invalid */
if (!some_pointer)
do_blah ();
/* invalid */
if (!number)
do_foo ();
/* invalid */
if (str && *str)
do_bar ();</code>
</section>
<section id="functions">
<title>Συναρτήσεις</title>
<p>
Functions should be declared by placing the returned value on a
separate line from the function name:
</p>
<code style="valid">
void
my_function (void)
{
…
}</code>
<p>
The argument list must be broken into a new line for each
argument, with the argument names right aligned, taking into
account pointers:
</p>
<code style="valid">
void
my_function (some_type_t type,
another_type_t *a_pointer,
double_ptr_t **double_pointer,
final_type_t another_type)
{
…
}</code>
<p>
If you use Emacs, you can use <code>M-x align</code> to do this
kind of alignment automatically. Just put the point and mark
around the function’s prototype, and invoke that command.
</p>
<p>
The alignment also holds when invoking a function without breaking the
line length limit:
</p>
<code style="valid">
align_function_arguments (first_argument,
second_argument,
third_argument);</code>
</section>
<section id="whitespace">
<title>Κενά διαστήματα</title>
<p>Προσθέστε πάντα ένα διάστημα πριν το άνοιγμα μιας παρένθεσης αλλά ποτέ μετά:</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid */
if (condition)
do_my_things ();
/* valid */
switch (condition) {
}</code>
<code style="invalid">
/* invalid */
if(condition)
do_my_things();
/* invalid */
if ( condition )
do_my_things ( );</code>
<p>Όταν ορίζετε μια δομή χρησιμοποιήστε νέες γραμμές για να διαχωρίσετε τα λογικά κομμάτια της δομής:</p>
<code style="valid">
struct _GtkWrapBoxPrivate
{
GtkOrientation orientation;
GtkWrapAllocationMode mode;
GtkWrapBoxSpreading horizontal_spreading;
GtkWrapBoxSpreading vertical_spreading;
guint16 vertical_spacing;
guint16 horizontal_spacing;
guint16 minimum_line_children;
guint16 natural_line_children;
GList *children;
};</code>
<p>
Do not eliminate whitespace and newlines just because something would
fit on a single line:
</p>
<code style="invalid">
/* invalid */
if (condition) foo (); else bar ();</code>
<p>
Do eliminate trailing whitespace on any line, preferably as a separate
patch or commit. Never use empty lines at the beginning or at the end of
a file.
</p>
<p>Παρακάτω ακολουθεί μια συνάρτηση Emacs με την οποία μπορείτε να καθαρίσετε τις γραμμές με κενά διαστήματα στο τέλος αυτής.</p>
<code>
(defun clean-line-ends ()
(interactive)
(if (not buffer-read-only)
(save-excursion
(goto-char (point-min))
(let ((count 0))
(while (re-search-forward "[ ]+$" nil t)
(setq count (+ count 1))
(replace-match "" t t))
(message "Cleaned %d lines" count)))))</code>
</section>
<section id="switch">
<title>Η συνθήκη <code>switch</code></title>
<p>
A <code>switch</code> should open a block on a new
indentation level, and each <code>case</code> should start on
the same indentation level as the curly braces, with the case
block on a new indentation level:
</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid Linux kernel style */
switch (condition) {
case FOO:
do_foo ();
break;
case BAR:
do_bar ();
break;
}
/* valid GNU style */
switch (condition)
{
case FOO:
do_foo ();
break;
case BAR:
do_bar ();
break;
}</code>
<code style="invalid">
/* invalid */
switch (condition) {
case FOO: do_foo (); break;
case BAR: do_bar (); break;
}
/* invalid */
switch (condition)
{
case FOO: do_foo ();
break;
case BAR: do_bar ();
break;
}
/* invalid */
switch (condition)
{
case FOO:
do_foo ();
break;
case BAR:
do_bar ();
break;
}</code>
<p>
It is preferable, though not mandatory, to separate the various
cases with a newline:
</p>
<code style="valid">
switch (condition) {
case FOO:
do_foo ();
break;
case BAR:
do_bar ();
break;
default:
do_default ();
}</code>
<p>
The <code>break</code> statement for the <code>default</code> case is not
mandatory.
</p>
<p>
If switching over an enumerated type, a <code>case</code> statement must
exist for every member of the enumerated type. For members you do not
want to handle, alias their <code>case</code> statements to
<code>default</code>:
</p>
<code style="valid">
switch (enumerated_condition) {
case HANDLED_1:
do_foo ();
break;
case HANDLED_2:
do_bar ();
break;
case IGNORED_1:
case IGNORED_2:
default:
do_default ();
}</code>
<p>
If most members of the enumerated type should not be handled, consider
using an <code>if</code> statement instead of a <code>switch</code>.
</p>
<p>
If a <code>case</code> block needs to declare new variables, the same rules as the
inner blocks apply (see above); the <code>break</code> statement should be placed
outside of the inner block:
</p>
<code style="valid">
/* valid GNU style */
switch (condition)
{
case FOO:
{
int foo;
foo = do_foo ();
}
break;
…
}</code>
</section>
<section id="header-files">
<title>Κεφαλίδες</title>
<p>
The only major rule for headers is that the function definitions
should be vertically aligned in three columns:
</p>
<code style="valid">
return_type function_name (type argument,
type argument,
type argument);</code>
<p>
The maximum width of each column is given by the longest element
in the column:
</p>
<code style="valid">
void gtk_type_set_property (GtkType *type,
const gchar *value,
GError **error);
const gchar *gtk_type_get_property (GtkType *type);</code>
<p>
It is also possible to align the columns to the next tab:
</p>
<code style="valid">
void gtk_type_set_prop (GtkType *type,
gfloat value);
gfloat gtk_type_get_prop (GtkType *type);
gint gtk_type_update_foobar (GtkType *type);</code>
<p>
As before, you can use <code>M-x align</code> in Emacs to do
this automatically.
</p>
<p>
If you are creating a public library, try to export a single
public header file that in turn includes all the smaller header
files into it. This is so that public headers are never
included directly; rather a single include is used in
applications. For example, GTK+ uses the following in its
header files that should not be included directly by
applications:
</p>
<code style="valid">
#if !defined (__GTK_H_INSIDE__) && !defined (GTK_COMPILATION)
#error "Only <gtk/gtk.h> can be included directly."
#endif</code>
<p>
For libraries, all headers should have inclusion guards (for
internal usage) and C++ guards. These provide the <code>extern
"C"</code> magic that C++ requires to include plain C headers:
</p>
<code style="valid">
#ifndef MYLIB_FOO_H_
#define MYLIB_FOO_H_
#include <gtk/gtk.h>
G_BEGIN_DECLS
…
G_END_DECLS
#endif /* MYLIB_FOO_H_ */</code>
</section>
<section id="gobject">
<title>Κλάσεις GObject</title>
<p>
GObject class definitions and implementations require some
additional coding style notices, and should always be
<link xref="namespacing#gobject">correctly namespaced</link>.
</p>
<p>
Typedef declarations should be placed at the beginning of the file:
</p>
<code style="valid">
typedef struct _GtkBoxedStruct GtkBoxedStruct;
typedef struct _GtkMoreBoxedStruct GtkMoreBoxedStruct;</code>
<p>
This includes enumeration types:
</p>
<code style="valid">
typedef enum
{
GTK_SIZE_REQUEST_WIDTH_FOR_HEIGHT,
GTK_SIZE_REQUEST_HEIGHT_FOR_WIDTH
} GtkSizeRequestMode;</code>
<p>Και τύπους επανάκλησης:</p>
<code style="valid">
typedef void (* GtkCallback) (GtkWidget *widget,
gpointer user_data);</code>
<p>
Instance structures should be declared using
<code>G_DECLARE_FINAL_TYPE</code> or
<code>G_DECLARE_DERIVABLE_TYPE</code>:
</p>
<code style="valid">
#define GTK_TYPE_FOO (gtk_foo_get_type ())
G_DECLARE_FINAL_TYPE (GtkFoo, gtk_foo, GTK, FOO, GtkWidget)</code>
<p>
For final types, private data can be stored in the object struct, which
should be defined in the C file:
</p>
<code style="valid">
struct _GtkFoo
{
GObject parent_instance;
guint private_data;
gpointer more_private_data;
};</code>
<p>
For derivable types, private data must be stored in a private struct in
the C file, configured using <code>G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_PRIVATE()</code>
and accessed using a <code>_get_instance_private()</code> function:
</p>
<code style="valid">
#define GTK_TYPE_FOO gtk_foo_get_type ()
G_DECLARE_DERIVABLE_TYPE (GtkFoo, gtk_foo, GTK, FOO, GtkWidget)
struct _GtkFooClass
{
GtkWidgetClass parent_class;
void (* handle_frob) (GtkFrobber *frobber,
guint n_frobs);
gpointer padding[12];
};</code>
<p>
Always use the <code>G_DEFINE_TYPE()</code>,
<code>G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_PRIVATE()</code>, and
<code>G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_CODE()</code> macros, or their abstract variants
<code>G_DEFINE_ABSTRACT_TYPE()</code>,
<code>G_DEFINE_ABSTRACT_TYPE_WITH_PRIVATE()</code>,
and <code>G_DEFINE_ABSTRACT_TYPE_WITH_CODE()</code>; also, use the similar
macros for defining interfaces and boxed types.
</p>
<p>
Interface types should always have the dummy typedef for cast
purposes:
</p>
<code style="valid">
typedef struct _GtkFooable GtkFooable;</code>
<p>
The interface structure should have ‘Interface’ postfixed to the
dummy typedef:
</p>
<code style="valid">
typedef struct _GtkFooableInterface GtkFooableInterface;</code>
<p>
Interfaces must have the following macros:
</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td><p>Μακροεντολή</p></td>
<td><p>Expands to</p></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><p><code>GTK_TYPE_<var>iface_name</var></code></p></td>
<td><p><code><var>iface_name</var>_get_type</code></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p><code>GTK_<var>iface_name</var></code></p></td>
<td><p><code>G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST</code></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p><code>GTK_IS_<var>iface_name</var></code></p></td>
<td><p><code>G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_TYPE</code></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p><code>GTK_<var>iface_name</var>_GET_IFACE</code></p></td>
<td><p><code>G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_INTERFACE</code></p></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section id="memory-allocation">
<title>Memory Allocation</title>
<p>
When dynamically allocating data on the heap use <code>g_new()</code>.
</p>
<p>
Public structure types should always be returned after being
zero-ed, either explicitly for each member, or by using
<code>g_new0()</code>.
</p>
<p>Για περισσότερες λεπτομέρειες δείτε <link xref="memory-management"/>.</p>
</section>
<section id="macros">
<title>Μακροεντολές</title>
<p>
Try to avoid private macros unless strictly necessary. Remember
to <code>#undef</code> them at the end of a block or a series of functions
needing them.
</p>
<p>
Inline functions are usually preferable to private macros.
</p>
<p>
Public macros should not be used unless they evaluate to a
constant.
</p>
</section>
<section id="public-api">
<title>Δημόσιο API</title>
<p>
Avoid exporting variables as public API, since this is
cumbersome on some platforms. It is always preferable to add
getters and setters instead. Also, beware global variables in
general.
</p>
</section>
<section id="private-api">
<title>Ιδιωτικό API</title>
<p>
Non-exported functions that are needed in more than one source file
should be prefixed with an underscore (‘_’), and declared in a
private header file. For example, <code>_mylib_internal_foo()</code>.
</p>
<p>
Underscore-prefixed functions are never exported.
</p>
<p>
Non-exported functions that are only needed in one source file
should be declared static.
</p>
</section>
</page>
|