This file is indexed.

/usr/share/polymake/demo/polytope_semantics.ipynb is in polymake-common 3.2r2-3.

This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.

The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
{
 "cells": [
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "## Semantics of Cones and Polytopes\n",
    "\n",
    "### General Remarks\n",
    "\n",
    "The general semantics of a [ big object](https///polymake.org/doku.php/howto/lingo#big_object ) in polymake is as follows: a list of properties describes an equivalence class of mathematical objects.  Often this equivalence class consists of a single element, but this is not necessary.\n",
    "\n",
    "As an example an object of class [Polytope](https///polymake.org/release_docs/latest/polytope.html#polytope__Polytope__9) defined by `VERTICES` gives such a single element equivalence class.  A typical example of a class with several elements is a polytope given combinatorially, in terms of `VERTICES_IN_FACETS`.  An extreme case would be a Polytope object defined by `VOLUME` only, defining the set of polytopes of all possible dimensions which happen to have that volume.  While this  is not very useful, a similar example would be a Polytope object defined by `F_VECTOR` only.  From this it makes sense to derive, e.g., `N_VERTICES` or `H_VECTOR`.\n",
    "\n",
    "All big objects are immutable as mathematical objects.  This means it is possible to add more properties, but only consistent ones.  Ideally, these properties pre-exist (since they are logically derived from the input description of the object), and the rules only make them explicit. If a user asks for a property which cannot be derived, this property is set to `undef`.  This occurs, e.g., if one asks for the `VERTICES` of a combinatorially defined polytope.\n",
    "\n",
    "To view the list properties that currently constitute your object, you can use the `properties` method.\n",
    "\n",
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "$p = new Polytope(POINTS=>[[1,2],[1,3]]);"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "name: p\n",
       "type: Polytope<Rational>\n",
       "    \n"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 1,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "$p->properties;"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "    POINTS\n",
    "    1 2\n",
    "    1 3\n",
    "    \n",
    "    \n",
    "    CONE_AMBIENT_DIM\n",
    "    2\n",
    "\n",
    "\n",
    "## Objects of type `Polytope`\n",
    "\n",
    "Polytope theory is nice because this is where combinatorics meets metric geometry.  For mathematical software dealing with such objects it is necessary to get the semantics straight. Below we describe some pitfalls.\n",
    "\n",
    "### With coordinates: Geometry\n",
    "\n",
    "Being non-empty is recorded in the property `FEASIBLE`. This is `true` if and only if the polytope is not empty.\n",
    "\n",
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "1\n",
       "\n"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 2,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "print cube(3)->FEASIBLE;"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "\n",
    "A non-empty polytope in R^n is encoded as its homogenization in R^{n+1}.  Hence, any non-empty polytope has at least one facet (which may be the far hyperplane [1,0,0,...,0]) and one vertex. \n",
    "\n",
    "\n",
    "### Without coordinates: Combinatorics\n",
    "\n",
    "`VERTICES_IN_FACETS` always describes the combinatorics of a bounded polytope: this is any polytope which is projectively equivalent to the polyhedron defined by `VERTICES` or `POINTS` or dually modulo its `LINEALITY_SPACE`.\n",
    "\n",
    "Each property must clearly specify if it depends on the geometry or only on the combinatorics.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Special Cases\n",
    "\n",
    "Most of what comes below is a consequence of the design decisions explained above.\n",
    "\n",
    "#### Empty polytopes\n",
    "\n",
    "With the introduction of the `Cone` class and redefining `Polytope` as a derived class (in version 2.9.10) this raises the question of how to deal with empty polytopes.\n",
    "This is a bit subtle as the cone over an empty polytope does not have a canonical definition.  Most text books hence exclude this case.  For them a polytope is never empty.  There was a time when this was also polymake's point of view (until version 2.3).\n",
    "\n",
    "However, this was changed for the reason that often people generate systems of inequalities and then look at the feasible region.  Most of the time they obtain a polytope and proceed, but sometimes it fails, and the region is empty.  It is therefore necessary to give a definition of the empty polytope (geometrically) which is consistent:\n",
    "\n",
    "An empty polytope is recognized by `FEASIBLE == false`.  Such a polytope is required to have `VERTICES` and `FACETS` empty.\n",
    "\n",
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "$e = new Polytope(POINTS=>[]);\n",
    "print $e->FEASIBLE;"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       " \n",
       "\n"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 3,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "print $e->FACETS;"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "This is totally different from having `VERTICES` or `FACETS` undefined (see above).\n",
    "\n",
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       " polytope > print $nc->FACETS;\n",
       "polymake:  WARNING: available properties insufficient to compute 'FACETS'\n",
       "\n"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 4,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "$nc = new Polytope(VERTICES_IN_FACETS => cube(2)->VERTICES_IN_FACETS);"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "#### Zero-dimensional polytopes\n",
    "\n",
    "A zero-dimensional polytope is a single point.  In our model it has one vertex and one facet (the far hyperplane).\n",
    "\n",
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "$z = new Polytope(POINTS=>[[1,2,3]]);"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "1 0 0\n",
       "\n"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 5,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "print $z->FACETS;"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "\n",
    "`VERTICES_IN_FACETS` is a 1-by-1 matrix with a zero entry.  This means that the single vertex does *not* lie on the single facet.\n",
    "\n",
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "{}\n",
       "\n"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 6,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "print $z->VERTICES_IN_FACETS;"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "\n",
    "Such a polytope is both simple and simplicial, i.e. it is a simplex.\n",
    "\n",
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "1,1\n",
       "\n"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 7,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "print $z->SIMPLICIAL,\",\",$z->SIMPLE;"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "\n",
    "#### Zero-dimensional fans\n",
    "\n",
    "A zero-dimensional fan can e.g. be defined via\n",
    "\n",
    "    \n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "$f = new fan::PolyhedralFan(RAYS=>[], MAXIMAL_CONES=>[[]]);"
   ]
  },
  {
   "attachments": {},
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "\n",
    "### Summing Up\n",
    "\n",
    "For instance we have four possibilities which can occur for `VERTICES`. The property\n",
    "\n",
    "*  does not exist (it is not listed in `properties`): This basically means that the property is not derived/calculated, yet.\n",
    "\n",
    "*  exists and is set to `undef`: Polymake is not able to derive this property with the given properties. The polytope may be empty or not.\n",
    "\n",
    "*  exists and is empty: So the polytope is empty.\n",
    "\n",
    "*  exists and is neither set to `undef` nor is empty: Our polytope is not empty and the property returns what you expect.\n",
    "\n"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "metadata": {
  "kernelspec": {
   "display_name": "polymake",
   "language": "polymake",
   "name": "polymake"
  },
  "language_info": {
   "codemirror_mode": "perl",
   "file_extension": ".pm",
   "mimetype": "text/x-polymake",
   "name": "polymake"
  }
 },
 "nbformat": 4,
 "nbformat_minor": 2
}