/usr/lib/R/site-library/DESeq2/doc/DESeq2.Rmd is in r-bioc-deseq2 1.18.1-1.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 2081 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 2218 2219 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 2367 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2397 2398 2399 2400 2401 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2410 2411 2412 2413 2414 2415 2416 2417 2418 2419 2420 2421 2422 2423 2424 2425 2426 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 2432 2433 2434 2435 2436 2437 2438 2439 2440 2441 2442 2443 2444 2445 2446 2447 2448 2449 2450 2451 2452 2453 2454 2455 2456 2457 2458 2459 2460 2461 2462 2463 2464 2465 2466 2467 2468 2469 2470 2471 2472 2473 2474 2475 2476 2477 2478 2479 2480 2481 2482 2483 2484 2485 2486 2487 2488 2489 2490 2491 2492 2493 2494 2495 2496 2497 2498 2499 2500 2501 2502 2503 2504 2505 | ---
title: "Analyzing RNA-seq data with DESeq2"
author: "Michael I. Love, Simon Anders, and Wolfgang Huber"
date: "`r BiocStyle::doc_date()`"
package: "`r BiocStyle::pkg_ver('DESeq2')`"
abstract: >
A basic task in the analysis of count data from RNA-seq is the
detection of differentially expressed genes. The count data are
presented as a table which reports, for each sample, the number of
sequence fragments that have been assigned to each gene. Analogous
data also arise for other assay types, including comparative ChIP-Seq,
HiC, shRNA screening, mass spectrometry. An important analysis
question is the quantification and statistical inference of systematic
changes between conditions, as compared to within-condition
variability. The package DESeq2 provides methods to test for
differential expression by use of negative binomial generalized linear
models; the estimates of dispersion and logarithmic fold changes
incorporate data-driven prior distributions This vignette explains the
use of the package and demonstrates typical workflows.
[An RNA-seq workflow](http://www.bioconductor.org/help/workflows/rnaseqGene/)
on the Bioconductor website covers similar material to this vignette
but at a slower pace, including the generation of count matrices from
FASTQ files.
DESeq2 package version: `r packageVersion("DESeq2")`
output:
rmarkdown::html_document:
highlight: pygments
toc: true
fig_width: 5
bibliography: library.bib
vignette: >
%\VignetteIndexEntry{Analyzing RNA-seq data with DESeq2}
%\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown}
%\VignetteEncoding[utf8]{inputenc}
---
```{r setup, echo=FALSE, results="hide"}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(tidy=FALSE, cache=TRUE,
dev="png",
message=FALSE, error=FALSE, warning=TRUE)
```
# Standard workflow
**Note:** if you use DESeq2 in published research, please cite:
> Love, M.I., Huber, W., Anders, S. (2014)
> Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.
> *Genome Biology*, **15**:550.
> [10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8](http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8)
Other Bioconductor packages with similar aims are
[edgeR](http://bioconductor.org/packages/edgeR),
[limma](http://bioconductor.org/packages/limma),
[DSS](http://bioconductor.org/packages/DSS),
[EBSeq](http://bioconductor.org/packages/EBSeq), and
[baySeq](http://bioconductor.org/packages/baySeq).
## Quick start
Here we show the most basic steps for a differential expression
analysis. There are a variety of steps upstream of DESeq2 that result
in the generation of counts or estimated counts for each sample, which
we will discuss in the sections below. This code chunk assumes that
you have a count matrix called `cts` and a table of sample
information called `coldata`. The `design` indicates how to model the
samples, here, that we want to measure the effect of the condition,
controlling for batch differences. The two factor variables `batch`
and `condition` should be columns of `coldata`.
```{r quickStart, eval=FALSE}
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = cts,
colData = coldata,
design= ~ batch + condition)
dds <- DESeq(dds)
res <- results(dds, contrast=c("condition","treat","ctrl"))
resultsNames(dds)
res <- lfcShrink(dds, coef=2)
```
The following starting functions will be explained below:
* If you have transcript quantification files, as produced by
*Salmon*, *Sailfish*, or *kallisto*, you would use
*DESeqDataSetFromTximport*.
* If you have *htseq-count* files, the first line would use
*DESeqDataSetFromHTSeq*.
* If you have a *RangedSummarizedExperiment*, the first line would use
*DESeqDataSet*.
## How to get help for DESeq2
Any and all DESeq2 questions should be posted to the
**Bioconductor support site**, which serves as a searchable knowledge
base of questions and answers:
<https://support.bioconductor.org>
Posting a question and tagging with "DESeq2" will automatically send
an alert to the package authors to respond on the support site. See
the first question in the list of [Frequently Asked Questions](#FAQ)
(FAQ) for information about how to construct an informative post.
You should **not** email your question to the package authors, as we will
just reply that the question should be posted to the
**Bioconductor support site**.
## Input data
### Why un-normalized counts?
As input, the DESeq2 package expects count data as obtained, e.g.,
from RNA-seq or another high-throughput sequencing experiment, in the form of a
matrix of integer values. The value in the *i*-th row and the *j*-th column of
the matrix tells how many reads can be assigned to gene *i* in sample *j*.
Analogously, for other types of assays, the rows of the matrix might correspond
e.g. to binding regions (with ChIP-Seq) or peptide sequences (with
quantitative mass spectrometry). We will list method for obtaining count matrices
in sections below.
The values in the matrix should be un-normalized counts or estimated
counts of sequencing reads (for
single-end RNA-seq) or fragments (for paired-end RNA-seq).
The [RNA-seq workflow](http://www.bioconductor.org/help/workflows/rnaseqGene/)
describes multiple techniques for preparing such count matrices. It
is important to provide count matrices as input for DESeq2's
statistical model [@Love2014] to hold, as only the count values allow
assessing the measurement precision correctly. The DESeq2 model
internally corrects for library size, so transformed or normalized
values such as counts scaled by library size should not be used as
input.
### The DESeqDataSet
The object class used by the DESeq2 package to store the read counts
and the intermediate estimated quantities during statistical analysis
is the *DESeqDataSet*, which will usually be represented in the code
here as an object `dds`.
A technical detail is that the *DESeqDataSet* class extends the
*RangedSummarizedExperiment* class of the
[SummarizedExperiment](http://bioconductor.org/packages/SummarizedExperiment) package.
The "Ranged" part refers to the fact that the rows of the assay data
(here, the counts) can be associated with genomic ranges (the exons of genes).
This association facilitates downstream exploration of results, making use of
other Bioconductor packages' range-based functionality
(e.g. find the closest ChIP-seq peaks to the differentially expressed genes).
A *DESeqDataSet* object must have an associated *design formula*.
The design formula expresses the variables which will be
used in modeling. The formula should be a tilde (~) followed by the
variables with plus signs between them (it will be coerced into an
*formula* if it is not already). The design can be changed later,
however then all differential analysis steps should be repeated,
as the design formula is used to estimate the dispersions and
to estimate the log2 fold changes of the model.
*Note*: In order to benefit from the default settings of the
package, you should put the variable of interest at the end of the
formula and make sure the control level is the first level.
We will now show 4 ways of constructing a *DESeqDataSet*, depending
on what pipeline was used upstream of DESeq2 to generated counts or
estimated counts:
1) From [transcript abundance files and tximport](#tximport)
2) From a [count matrix](#countmat)
3) From [htseq-count files](#htseq)
4) From a [SummarizedExperiment](#se) object
<a name="tximport"/>
### Transcript abundance files and *tximport* input
A newer and recommended pipeline is to use fast transcript
abundance quantifiers upstream of DESeq2, and then to create
gene-level count matrices for use with DESeq2
by importing the quantification data using the
[tximport](http://bioconductor.org/packages/tximport)
package. This workflow allows users to import transcript abundance estimates
from a variety of external software, including the following methods:
* [Salmon](http://combine-lab.github.io/salmon/)
[@Patro2017Salmon]
* [Sailfish](http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ckingsf/software/sailfish/)
[@Patro2014Sailfish]
* [kallisto](https://pachterlab.github.io/kallisto/about.html)
[@Bray2016Near]
* [RSEM](http://deweylab.github.io/RSEM/)
[@Li2011RSEM]
Some advantages of using the above methods for transcript abundance
estimation are:
(i) this approach corrects for potential changes in gene length across samples
(e.g. from differential isoform usage) [@Trapnell2013Differential],
(ii) some of these methods (*Salmon*, *Sailfish*, *kallisto*)
are substantially faster and require less memory
and disk usage compared to alignment-based methods that require
creation and storage of BAM files, and
(iii) it is possible to avoid discarding those fragments that can
align to multiple genes with homologous sequence, thus increasing
sensitivity [@Robert2015Errors].
Full details on the motivation and methods for importing transcript
level abundance and count estimates, summarizing to gene-level count matrices
and producing an offset which corrects for potential changes in average
transcript length across samples are described in [@Soneson2015].
Note that the tximport-to-DESeq2 approach uses *estimated* gene
counts from the transcript abundance quantifiers, but not *normalized*
counts.
A tutorial on how to use the *Salmon* software for quantifying
transcript abundance can be
found [here](https://combine-lab.github.io/salmon/getting_started/).
We recommend using the `--gcBias`
[flag](http://salmon.readthedocs.io/en/latest/salmon.html#gcbias)
which estimates a correction factor for systematic biases
commonly present in RNA-seq data [@Love2016Modeling; @Patro2017Salmon],
unless you are certain that your data do not contain such bias.
Here, we demonstrate how to import transcript abundances
and construct of a gene-level *DESeqDataSet* object
from *Salmon* `quant.sf` files, which are
stored in the [tximportData](http://bioconductor.org/packages/tximportData) package.
You do not need the `tximportData` package for your analysis, it is
only used here for demonstration.
Note that, instead of locating `dir` using *system.file*,
a user would typically just provide a path, e.g. `/path/to/quant/files`.
For a typical use, the `condition` information should already be
present as a column of the sample table `samples`, while here we
construct artificial condition labels for demonstration.
```{r txiSetup}
library("tximport")
library("readr")
library("tximportData")
dir <- system.file("extdata", package="tximportData")
samples <- read.table(file.path(dir,"samples.txt"), header=TRUE)
samples$condition <- factor(rep(c("A","B"),each=3))
rownames(samples) <- samples$run
samples[,c("pop","center","run","condition")]
```
Next we specify the path to the files using the appropriate columns of
`samples`, and we read in a table that links transcripts to genes for
this dataset.
```{r txiFiles}
files <- file.path(dir,"salmon", samples$run, "quant.sf")
names(files) <- samples$run
tx2gene <- read.csv(file.path(dir, "tx2gene.csv"))
```
We import the necessary quantification data for DESeq2 using the
*tximport* function. For further details on use of *tximport*,
including the construction of the `tx2gene` table for linking
transcripts to genes in your dataset, please refer to the
[tximport](http://bioconductor.org/packages/tximport) package vignette.
```{r tximport, results="hide"}
txi <- tximport(files, type="salmon", tx2gene=tx2gene)
```
Finally, we can construct a *DESeqDataSet* from the `txi` object and
sample information in `samples`.
```{r txi2dds, results="hide"}
library("DESeq2")
ddsTxi <- DESeqDataSetFromTximport(txi,
colData = samples,
design = ~ condition)
```
The `ddsTxi` object here can then be used as `dds` in the
following analysis steps.
<a name="countmat"/>
### Count matrix input
Alternatively, the function *DESeqDataSetFromMatrix* can be
used if you already have a matrix of read counts prepared from another
source. Another method for quickly producing count matrices
from alignment files is the *featureCounts* function [@Liao2013feature]
in the [Rsubread](http://bioconductor.org/packages/Rsubread) package.
To use *DESeqDataSetFromMatrix*, the user should provide
the counts matrix, the information about the samples (the columns of the
count matrix) as a *DataFrame* or *data.frame*, and the design formula.
To demonstate the use of *DESeqDataSetFromMatrix*,
we will read in count data from the
[pasilla](http://bioconductor.org/packages/pasilla) package.
We read in a count matrix, which we will name `cts`,
and the sample information table, which we will name `coldata`.
Further below we describe how to extract these objects from,
e.g. *featureCounts* output.
```{r loadPasilla}
library("pasilla")
pasCts <- system.file("extdata",
"pasilla_gene_counts.tsv",
package="pasilla", mustWork=TRUE)
pasAnno <- system.file("extdata",
"pasilla_sample_annotation.csv",
package="pasilla", mustWork=TRUE)
cts <- as.matrix(read.csv(pasCts,sep="\t",row.names="gene_id"))
coldata <- read.csv(pasAnno, row.names=1)
coldata <- coldata[,c("condition","type")]
```
We examine the count matrix and column data to see if they are
consistent in terms of sample order.
```{r showPasilla}
head(cts,2)
coldata
```
Note that these are not in the same order with respect to samples!
It is absolutely critical that the columns of the count matrix and the
rows of the column data (information about samples) are in the same
order. DESeq2 will not make guesses as to which column of the count
matrix belongs to which row of the column data, these must be provided
to DESeq2 already in consistent order.
As they are not in the correct order as given, we need to re-arrange
one or the other so that they are consistent in terms of sample order
(if we do not, later functions would produce an error). We
additionally need to chop off the `"fb"` of the row names of
`coldata`, so the naming is consistent.
```{r reorderPasila}
rownames(coldata) <- sub("fb", "", rownames(coldata))
all(rownames(coldata) %in% colnames(cts))
all(rownames(coldata) == colnames(cts))
cts <- cts[, rownames(coldata)]
all(rownames(coldata) == colnames(cts))
```
If you have used the *featureCounts* function [@Liao2013feature] in the
[Rsubread](http://bioconductor.org/packages/Rsubread) package,
the matrix of read counts can be directly
provided from the `"counts"` element in the list output.
The count matrix and column data can typically be read into R
from flat files using base R functions such as *read.csv*
or *read.delim*. For *htseq-count* files, see the dedicated input
function below.
With the count matrix, `cts`, and the sample
information, `coldata`, we can construct a *DESeqDataSet*:
```{r matrixInput}
library("DESeq2")
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = cts,
colData = coldata,
design = ~ condition)
dds
```
If you have additional feature data, it can be added to the
*DESeqDataSet* by adding to the metadata columns of a newly
constructed object. (Here we add redundant data just for demonstration, as
the gene names are already the rownames of the `dds`.)
```{r addFeatureData}
featureData <- data.frame(gene=rownames(cts))
mcols(dds) <- DataFrame(mcols(dds), featureData)
mcols(dds)
```
<a name="htseq"/>
### *htseq-count* input
You can use the function *DESeqDataSetFromHTSeqCount* if you
have used *htseq-count* from the
[HTSeq](http://www-huber.embl.de/users/anders/HTSeq)
python package [@Anders:2014:htseq].
For an example of using the python scripts, see the
[pasilla](http://bioconductor.org/packages/pasilla) data package. First you will want to specify a
variable which points to the directory in which the *htseq-count*
output files are located.
```{r htseqDirI, eval=FALSE}
directory <- "/path/to/your/files/"
```
However, for demonstration purposes only, the following line of
code points to the directory for the demo *htseq-count* output
files packages for the [pasilla](http://bioconductor.org/packages/pasilla) package.
```{r htseqDirII}
directory <- system.file("extdata", package="pasilla",
mustWork=TRUE)
```
We specify which files to read in using *list.files*,
and select those files which contain the string `"treated"`
using *grep*. The *sub* function is used to
chop up the sample filename to obtain the condition status, or
you might alternatively read in a phenotypic table
using *read.table*.
```{r htseqInput}
sampleFiles <- grep("treated",list.files(directory),value=TRUE)
sampleCondition <- sub("(.*treated).*","\\1",sampleFiles)
sampleTable <- data.frame(sampleName = sampleFiles,
fileName = sampleFiles,
condition = sampleCondition)
```
Then we build the *DESeqDataSet* using the following function:
```{r hsteqDds}
library("DESeq2")
ddsHTSeq <- DESeqDataSetFromHTSeqCount(sampleTable = sampleTable,
directory = directory,
design= ~ condition)
ddsHTSeq
```
<a name="se"/>
### *SummarizedExperiment* input
An example of the steps to produce a *RangedSummarizedExperiment* can
be found in the [RNA-seq workflow](http://www.bioconductor.org/help/workflows/rnaseqGene/)
and in the vignette for the data package [airway](http://bioconductor.org/packages/airway).
Here we load the *RangedSummarizedExperiment* from that package in
order to build a *DESeqDataSet*.
```{r loadSumExp}
library("airway")
data("airway")
se <- airway
```
The constructor function below shows the generation of a
*DESeqDataSet* from a *RangedSummarizedExperiment* `se`.
```{r sumExpInput}
library("DESeq2")
ddsSE <- DESeqDataSet(se, design = ~ cell + dex)
ddsSE
```
### Pre-filtering
While it is not necessary to pre-filter low count genes before running
the DESeq2 functions, there are two reasons which make pre-filtering
useful: by removing rows in which there are very few reads, we reduce
the memory size of the `dds` data object, and we increase the speed of
the transformation and testing functions within DESeq2. Here we
perform a minimal pre-filtering to keep only rows that have at least
10 reads total. Note that more strict filtering to increase power is
*automatically* applied via [independent filtering](#indfilt) on the
mean of normalized counts within the *results* function.
```{r prefilter}
keep <- rowSums(counts(dds)) >= 10
dds <- dds[keep,]
```
### Note on factor levels
By default, R will choose a *reference level* for factors based on
alphabetical order. Then, if you never tell the DESeq2 functions which
level you want to compare against (e.g. which level represents the
control group), the comparisons will be based on the alphabetical
order of the levels. There are two solutions: you can either
explicitly tell *results* which comparison to make using the
`contrast` argument (this will be shown later), or you can explicitly
set the factors levels. You should only change the factor levels
of variables in the design **before** running the DESeq2 analysis, not
during or afterward. Setting the factor levels can be done in two
ways, either using factor:
```{r factorlvl}
dds$condition <- factor(dds$condition, levels = c("untreated","treated"))
```
...or using *relevel*, just specifying the reference level:
```{r relevel}
dds$condition <- relevel(dds$condition, ref = "untreated")
```
If you need to subset the columns of a *DESeqDataSet*,
i.e., when removing certain samples from the analysis, it is possible
that all the samples for one or more levels of a variable in the design
formula would be removed. In this case, the *droplevels* function can be used
to remove those levels which do not have samples in the current *DESeqDataSet*:
```{r droplevels}
dds$condition <- droplevels(dds$condition)
```
### Collapsing technical replicates
DESeq2 provides a function *collapseReplicates* which can
assist in combining the counts from technical replicates into single
columns of the count matrix. The term *technical replicate*
implies multiple sequencing runs of the same library.
You should not collapse biological replicates using this function.
See the manual page for an example of the use of
*collapseReplicates*.
### About the pasilla dataset
We continue with the [pasilla](http://bioconductor.org/packages/pasilla) data constructed from the
count matrix method above. This data set is from an experiment on
*Drosophila melanogaster* cell cultures and investigated the
effect of RNAi knock-down of the splicing factor *pasilla*
[@Brooks2010]. The detailed transcript of the production of
the [pasilla](http://bioconductor.org/packages/pasilla) data is provided in the vignette of the
data package [pasilla](http://bioconductor.org/packages/pasilla).
<a name="de"/>
## Differential expression analysis
The standard differential expression analysis steps are wrapped
into a single function, *DESeq*. The estimation steps performed
by this function are described [below](#theory), in the manual page for
`?DESeq` and in the Methods section of the DESeq2 publication [@Love2014].
Results tables are generated using the function *results*, which
extracts a results table with log2 fold changes, *p* values and adjusted
*p* values. With no additional arguments to *results*, the log2 fold change and
Wald test *p* value will be for the last variable in the design
formula, and if this is a factor,
the comparison will be the last level of this variable over the first
level. However, the order of the variables of the design do not matter
so long as the user specifies the comparison using the `name` or
`contrast` arguments of *results* (described later and in `?results`).
Details about the comparison are printed to the console, above the
results table. The text, `condition treated vs untreated`, tells you that the
estimates are of the logarithmic fold change log2(treated/untreated).
```{r deseq}
dds <- DESeq(dds)
res <- results(dds)
res
```
<a name="lfcShrink"/>
In previous versions of DESeq2, the *DESeq* function by default
would produce moderated, or shrunken, log2 fold changes through the
use of the `betaPrior` argument. In version 1.16 and higher, we have
split the moderation of log2 fold changes into a separate function,
*lfcShrink*, for reasons described in the [changes section](#changes)
below.
Here we provide the `dds` object and the number of the
coefficient we want to moderate. It is also possible to specify a
`contrast`, instead of `coef`, which works the same as the `contrast`
argument of the *results* function.
If a results object is provided, the `log2FoldChange` column will be
swapped out, otherwise *lfcShrink* returns a vector of shrunken log2
fold changes.
```{r lfcShrink}
resultsNames(dds)
resLFC <- lfcShrink(dds, coef=2)
resLFC
```
<a name="parallel"/>
The above steps should take less than 30 seconds for most
analyses. For experiments with many samples (e.g. 100 samples), one
can take advantage of parallelized computation. Parallelizing `DESeq`,
`results`, and `lfcShrink` can be easily accomplished by loading the
BiocParallel package, and then setting the following arguments:
`parallel=TRUE` and `BPPARAM=MulticoreParam(4)`, for example,
splitting the job over 4 cores. Note that `results` for coefficients
or contrasts listed in `resultsNames(dds)` is fast and will not need
parallelization. As an alternative to `BPPARAM`, one can `register`
cores at the beginning of an analysis, and then just specify
`parallel=TRUE` to the functions when called.
```{r parallel, eval=FALSE}
library("BiocParallel")
register(MulticoreParam(4))
```
We can order our results table by the smallest *p* value:
```{r resOrder}
resOrdered <- res[order(res$pvalue),]
```
We can summarize some basic tallies using the
*summary* function.
```{r sumRes}
summary(res)
```
How many adjusted p-values were less than 0.1?
```{r sumRes01}
sum(res$padj < 0.1, na.rm=TRUE)
```
The *results* function contains a number of arguments to
customize the results table which is generated. You can read about
these arguments by looking up `?results`.
Note that the *results* function automatically performs independent
filtering based on the mean of normalized counts for each gene,
optimizing the number of genes which will have an adjusted *p* value
below a given FDR cutoff, `alpha`.
Independent filtering is further discussed [below](#indfilt).
By default the argument `alpha` is set to $0.1$. If the adjusted *p*
value cutoff will be a value other than $0.1$, `alpha` should be set to
that value:
```{r resAlpha05}
res05 <- results(dds, alpha=0.05)
summary(res05)
sum(res05$padj < 0.05, na.rm=TRUE)
```
<a name="IHW"/>
A generalization of the idea of *p* value filtering is to *weight*
hypotheses to optimize power. A Bioconductor
package, [IHW](http://bioconductor.org/packages/IHW), is available
that implements the method of *Independent Hypothesis Weighting*
[@Ignatiadis2016]. Here we show the use of *IHW* for *p* value
adjustment of DESeq2 results. For more details, please see the
vignette of the [IHW](http://bioconductor.org/packages/IHW)
package. The *IHW* result object is stored in the metadata.
**Note:** If the results of independent hypothesis weighting are used
in published research, please cite:
> Ignatiadis, N., Klaus, B., Zaugg, J.B., Huber, W. (2016)
> Data-driven hypothesis weighting increases detection power in genome-scale multiple testing.
> *Nature Methods*, **13**:7.
> [10.1038/nmeth.3885](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3885)
```{r IHW}
library("IHW")
resIHW <- results(dds, filterFun=ihw)
summary(resIHW)
sum(resIHW$padj < 0.1, na.rm=TRUE)
metadata(resIHW)$ihwResult
```
If a multi-factor design is used, or if the variable in the design
formula has more than two levels, the `contrast` argument of
*results* can be used to extract different comparisons from
the *DESeqDataSet* returned by *DESeq*.
The use of the `contrast` argument is further discussed [below](#contrasts).
For advanced users, note that all the values calculated by the DESeq2
package are stored in the *DESeqDataSet* object, and access
to these values is discussed [below](#access).
## Exploring and exporting results
### MA-plot
In DESeq2, the function *plotMA* shows the log2
fold changes attributable to a given variable over the mean of
normalized counts for all the samples in the *DESeqDataSet*.
Points will be colored red if the adjusted *p* value is less than 0.1.
Points which fall out of the window are plotted as open triangles pointing
either up or down.
```{r MA}
plotMA(res, ylim=c(-2,2))
```
It is more useful visualize the MA-plot for the shrunken log2 fold
changes, which remove the noise associated with log2 fold changes from
low count genes without requiring arbitrary filtering thresholds.
```{r shrunkMA}
plotMA(resLFC, ylim=c(-2,2))
```
After calling *plotMA*, one can use the function
*identify* to interactively detect the row number of
individual genes by clicking on the plot. One can then recover
the gene identifiers by saving the resulting indices:
```{r MAidentify, eval=FALSE}
idx <- identify(res$baseMean, res$log2FoldChange)
rownames(res)[idx]
```
### Alternative shrinkage estimators
The moderated log fold changes proposed by @Love2014 use a normal
prior distribution, centered on zero and with a scale that is fit to
the data. The shrunken log fold changes are useful for ranking and
visualization, without the need for arbitrary filters on low count
genes. The normal prior can sometimes produce too strong of
shrinkage for certain datasets. In DESeq2 version 1.18, we include two
additional adaptive shrinkage estimators, available via the `type`
argument of `lfcShrink`. For more details, see `?lfcShrink`
The options for `type` are:
* `normal` is the the original DESeq2 shrinkage estimator, an adaptive
normal prior
* `apeglm` is the adaptive t prior shrinkage estimator from the
[apeglm](http://bioconductor.org/packages/apeglm) package
* `ashr` is the adaptive shrinkage estimator from the
[ashr](https://github.com/stephens999/ashr) package [@Stephens2016].
Here DESeq2 uses the ashr option to fit a mixture of normal distributions to
form the prior, with `method="shrinkage"`
**Note:** if the shrinkage estimator `type="ashr"` is used in published
research, please cite:
> Stephens, M. (2016)
> False discovery rates: a new deal. *Biostatistics*, **18**:2.
> [10.1093/biostatistics/kxw041](https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxw041)
```{r warning=FALSE}
resApe <- lfcShrink(dds, coef=2, type="apeglm")
resAsh <- lfcShrink(dds, coef=2, type="ashr")
```
```{r fig.width=8, fig.height=3}
par(mfrow=c(1,3), mar=c(4,4,2,1))
xlim <- c(1,1e5); ylim <- c(-3,3)
plotMA(resLFC, xlim=xlim, ylim=ylim, main="normal")
plotMA(resApe, xlim=xlim, ylim=ylim, main="apeglm")
plotMA(resAsh, xlim=xlim, ylim=ylim, main="ashr")
```
**Note:** due to the nature of the statistical model and optimization
approach, `apeglm` is usually a factor of ~5 slower than `normal`. For
example, with 10,000 genes and 10 samples, `normal` may take ~3
seconds, while `apeglm` takes ~15 seconds (on a laptop). However,
`apeglm` can be more than an order of magnitude slower when there are
many coefficients, e.g. 10 or more coefficients in
`resultsNames(dds)`. The method `ashr` is fairly fast and does not
depend on the number of coefficients, as it uses only the estimated
MLE coefficients and their standard errors. A solution for speeding up
`normal` and `apeglm` is to use multiple cores. This can be easily
accomplished by loading the BiocParallel package, and then setting the
following arguments of `lfcShrink`: `parallel=TRUE` and
`BPPARAM=MulticoreParam(4)`, for example, splitting the job over 4
cores. This approach can also be used with `DESeq` and `results`, as
mentioned [above](#parallel).
**Note:** If there is unwanted variation present in the data (e.g. batch
effects) it is always recommend to correct for this, which can be
accommodated in DESeq2 by including in the design any known batch
variables or by using functions/packages such as
`svaseq` in [sva](http://bioconductor.org/packages/sva) [@Leek2014] or
the `RUV` functions in [RUVSeq](http://bioconductor.org/packages/RUVSeq) [@Risso2014]
to estimate variables that capture the unwanted variation.
In addition, the ashr developers have a
[specific method](https://github.com/dcgerard/vicar)
for accounting for unwanted variation in combination with ashr [@Gerard2017].
### Plot counts
It can also be useful to examine the counts of reads for a single gene
across the groups. A simple function for making this
plot is *plotCounts*, which normalizes counts by sequencing depth
and adds a pseudocount of 1/2 to allow for log scale plotting.
The counts are grouped by the variables in `intgroup`, where
more than one variable can be specified. Here we specify the gene
which had the smallest *p* value from the results table created
above. You can select the gene to plot by rowname or by numeric index.
```{r plotCounts}
plotCounts(dds, gene=which.min(res$padj), intgroup="condition")
```
For customized plotting, an argument `returnData` specifies
that the function should only return a *data.frame* for
plotting with *ggplot*.
```{r plotCountsAdv}
d <- plotCounts(dds, gene=which.min(res$padj), intgroup="condition",
returnData=TRUE)
library("ggplot2")
ggplot(d, aes(x=condition, y=count)) +
geom_point(position=position_jitter(w=0.1,h=0)) +
scale_y_log10(breaks=c(25,100,400))
```
### More information on results columns
Information about which variables and tests were used can be found by calling
the function *mcols* on the results object.
```{r metadata}
mcols(res)$description
```
For a particular gene, a log2 fold change of -1 for
`condition treated vs untreated` means that the treatment
induces a multiplicative change in observed gene expression level of
$2^{-1} = 0.5$ compared to the untreated condition. If the variable of
interest is continuous-valued, then the reported log2 fold change is
per unit of change of that variable.
<a name="pvaluesNA"/>
**Note on p-values set to NA**: some values in the results table
can be set to `NA` for one of the following reasons:
* If within a row, all samples have zero counts,
the `baseMean` column will be zero, and the
log2 fold change estimates, *p* value and adjusted *p* value
will all be set to `NA`.
* If a row contains a sample with an extreme count outlier
then the *p* value and adjusted *p* value will be set to `NA`.
These outlier counts are detected by Cook's distance. Customization
of this outlier filtering and description of functionality for
replacement of outlier counts and refitting is described
[below](#outlier)
* If a row is filtered by automatic independent filtering,
for having a low mean normalized count, then only the adjusted *p*
value will be set to `NA`.
Description and customization of independent filtering is
described [below](#indfilt)
### Rich visualization and reporting of results
**ReportingTools.** An HTML report of the results with plots and sortable/filterable columns
can be generated using the [ReportingTools](http://bioconductor.org/packages/ReportingTools) package
on a *DESeqDataSet* that has been processed by the *DESeq* function.
For a code example, see the *RNA-seq differential expression* vignette at
the [ReportingTools](http://bioconductor.org/packages/ReportingTools) page, or the manual page for the
*publish* method for the *DESeqDataSet* class.
**regionReport.** An HTML and PDF summary of the results with plots
can also be generated using the [regionReport](http://bioconductor.org/packages/regionReport) package.
The *DESeq2Report* function should be run on a
*DESeqDataSet* that has been processed by the *DESeq* function.
For more details see the manual page for *DESeq2Report*
and an example vignette in the [regionReport](http://bioconductor.org/packages/regionReport) package.
**Glimma.** Interactive visualization of DESeq2 output,
including MA-plots (also called MD-plot) can be generated using the
[Glimma](http://bioconductor.org/packages/Glimma) package. See the manual page for *glMDPlot.DESeqResults*.
**pcaExplorer.** Interactive visualization of DESeq2 output,
including PCA plots, boxplots of counts and other useful summaries can be
generated using the [pcaExplorer](http://bioconductor.org/packages/pcaExplorer) package.
See the *Launching the application* section of the package vignette.
### Exporting results to CSV files
A plain-text file of the results can be exported using the
base R functions *write.csv* or *write.delim*.
We suggest using a descriptive file name indicating the variable
and levels which were tested.
```{r export, eval=FALSE}
write.csv(as.data.frame(resOrdered),
file="condition_treated_results.csv")
```
Exporting only the results which pass an adjusted *p* value
threshold can be accomplished with the *subset* function,
followed by the *write.csv* function.
```{r subset}
resSig <- subset(resOrdered, padj < 0.1)
resSig
```
## Multi-factor designs
Experiments with more than one factor influencing the counts can be
analyzed using design formula that include the additional variables.
In fact, DESeq2 can analyze any possible experimental design that can
be expressed with fixed effects terms (multiple factors, designs with
interactions, designs with continuous variables, splines, and so on
are all possible).
By adding variables to the design, one can control for additional variation
in the counts. For example, if the condition samples are balanced
across experimental batches, by including the `batch` factor to the
design, one can increase the sensitivity for finding differences due
to `condition`. There are multiple ways to analyze experiments when the
additional variables are of interest and not just controlling factors
(see [section on interactions](#interactions)).
The data in the [pasilla](http://bioconductor.org/packages/pasilla)
package have a condition of interest
(the column `condition`), as well as information on the type of sequencing
which was performed (the column `type`), as we can see below:
```{r multifactor}
colData(dds)
```
We create a copy of the *DESeqDataSet*, so that we can rerun
the analysis using a multi-factor design.
```{r copyMultifactor}
ddsMF <- dds
```
We change the levels of `type` so it only contains letters (numbers, underscore and
period are also allowed in design factor levels). Be careful when
changing level names to use the same order as the current levels.
```{r fixLevels}
levels(ddsMF$type)
levels(ddsMF$type) <- sub("-.*", "", levels(ddsMF$type))
levels(ddsMF$type)
```
We can account for the different types of sequencing, and get a clearer picture
of the differences attributable to the treatment. As `condition` is the
variable of interest, we put it at the end of the formula. Thus the *results*
function will by default pull the `condition` results unless
`contrast` or `name` arguments are specified.
Then we can re-run *DESeq*:
```{r replaceDesign}
design(ddsMF) <- formula(~ type + condition)
ddsMF <- DESeq(ddsMF)
```
Again, we access the results using the *results* function.
```{r multiResults}
resMF <- results(ddsMF)
head(resMF)
```
It is also possible to retrieve the log2 fold changes, *p* values and adjusted
*p* values of the `type` variable. The `contrast` argument of
the function *results* takes a character vector of length three:
the name of the variable, the name of the factor level for the numerator
of the log2 ratio, and the name of the factor level for the denominator.
The `contrast` argument can also take other forms, as
described in the help page for *results* and [below](#contrasts)
```{r multiTypeResults}
resMFType <- results(ddsMF,
contrast=c("type", "single", "paired"))
head(resMFType)
```
If the variable is continuous or an interaction term
(see [section on interactions](#interactions))
then the results can be extracted using the `name` argument to *results*,
where the name is one of elements returned by `resultsNames(dds)`.
<a name="transform"/>
# Data transformations and visualization
## Count data transformations
In order to test for differential expression, we operate on raw counts
and use discrete distributions as described in the previous section on
differential expression.
However for other downstream analyses --
e.g. for visualization or clustering -- it might be useful
to work with transformed versions of the count data.
Maybe the most obvious choice of transformation is the logarithm.
Since count values for a gene can be zero in some
conditions (and non-zero in others), some advocate the use of
*pseudocounts*, i.e. transformations of the form:
$$ y = \log_2(n + n_0) $$
where *n* represents the count values and $n_0$ is a positive constant.
In this section, we discuss two alternative
approaches that offer more theoretical justification and a rational way
of choosing parameters equivalent to $n_0$ above.
One makes use of the concept of variance stabilizing
transformations (VST) [@Tibshirani1988; @sagmb2003; @Anders:2010:GB],
and the other is the *regularized logarithm* or *rlog*, which
incorporates a prior on the sample differences [@Love2014].
Both transformations produce transformed data on the log2 scale
which has been normalized with respect to library size or other
normalization factors.
The point of these two transformations, the VST and the *rlog*,
is to remove the dependence of the variance on the mean,
particularly the high variance of the logarithm of count data when the
mean is low. Both VST and *rlog* use the experiment-wide trend
of variance over mean, in order to transform the data to remove the
experiment-wide trend. Note that we do not require or
desire that all the genes have *exactly* the same variance after
transformation. Indeed, in a figure below, you will see
that after the transformations the genes with the same mean do not
have exactly the same standard deviations, but that the
experiment-wide trend has flattened. It is those genes with row
variance above the trend which will allow us to cluster samples into
interesting groups.
**Note on running time:** if you have many samples (e.g. 100s),
the *rlog* function might take too long, and so the *vst* function
will be a faster choice.
The rlog and VST have similar properties, but the rlog requires
fitting a shrinkage term for each sample and each gene which takes
time. See the DESeq2 paper for more discussion on the differences
[@Love2014].
### Blind dispersion estimation
The two functions, *vst* and *rlog* have an argument
`blind`, for whether the transformation should be blind to the
sample information specified by the design formula. When
`blind` equals `TRUE` (the default), the functions
will re-estimate the dispersions using only an intercept.
This setting should be used in order to compare
samples in a manner wholly unbiased by the information about
experimental groups, for example to perform sample QA (quality
assurance) as demonstrated below.
However, blind dispersion estimation is not the appropriate choice if
one expects that many or the majority of genes (rows) will have large
differences in counts which are explainable by the experimental design,
and one wishes to transform the data for downstream analysis. In this
case, using blind dispersion estimation will lead to large estimates
of dispersion, as it attributes differences due to experimental design
as unwanted *noise*, and will result in overly shrinking the transformed
values towards each other.
By setting `blind` to `FALSE`, the dispersions
already estimated will be used to perform transformations, or if not
present, they will be estimated using the current design formula. Note
that only the fitted dispersion estimates from mean-dispersion trend
line are used in the transformation (the global dependence of
dispersion on mean for the entire experiment).
So setting `blind` to `FALSE` is still for the most
part not using the information about which samples were in which
experimental group in applying the transformation.
### Extracting transformed values
These transformation functions return an object of class *DESeqTransform*
which is a subclass of *RangedSummarizedExperiment*.
For ~20 samples, running on a newly created `DESeqDataSet`,
*rlog* may take 30 seconds, while *vst* takes less than 1 second.
The running times are shorter when using `blind=FALSE` and
if the function *DESeq* has already been run, because then
it is not necessary to re-estimate the dispersion values.
The *assay* function is used to extract the matrix of normalized values.
```{r rlogAndVST}
vsd <- vst(dds, blind=FALSE)
rld <- rlog(dds, blind=FALSE)
head(assay(vsd), 3)
```
### Variance stabilizing transformation
Above, we used a parametric fit for the dispersion. In this case, the
closed-form expression for the variance stabilizing transformation is
used by the *vst* function. If a local fit is used (option
`fitType="locfit"` to *estimateDispersions*) a numerical integration
is used instead. The transformed data should be approximated variance
stabilized and also includes correction for size factors or
normalization factors. The transformed data is on the log2 scale for
large counts.
### Regularized log transformation
The function *rlog*, stands for *regularized log*,
transforming the original count data to the log2 scale by fitting a
model with a term for each sample and a prior distribution on the
coefficients which is estimated from the data. This is the same kind
of shrinkage (sometimes referred to as regularization, or moderation)
of log fold changes used by the *DESeq* and
*nbinomWaldTest*. The resulting data contains elements defined as:
$$ \log_2(q_{ij}) = \beta_{i0} + \beta_{ij} $$
where $q_{ij}$ is a parameter proportional to the expected true
concentration of fragments for gene *i* and sample *j* (see
formula [below](#theory)), $\beta_{i0}$ is an intercept which does not
undergo shrinkage, and $\beta_{ij}$ is the sample-specific effect
which is shrunk toward zero based on the dispersion-mean trend over
the entire dataset. The trend typically captures high dispersions for
low counts, and therefore these genes exhibit higher shrinkage from
the *rlog*.
Note that, as $q_{ij}$ represents the part of the mean value
$\mu_{ij}$ after the size factor $s_j$ has been divided out, it is
clear that the rlog transformation inherently accounts for differences
in sequencing depth. Without priors, this design matrix would lead to
a non-unique solution, however the addition of a prior on
non-intercept betas allows for a unique solution to be found.
### Effects of transformations on the variance
The figure below plots the standard deviation of the transformed data,
across samples, against the mean, using the shifted logarithm
transformation, the regularized log transformation and the variance
stabilizing transformation. The shifted logarithm has elevated
standard deviation in the lower count range, and the regularized log
to a lesser extent, while for the variance stabilized data the
standard deviation is roughly constant along the whole dynamic range.
Note that the vertical axis in such plots is the square root of the
variance over all samples, so including the variance due to the
experimental conditions. While a flat curve of the square root of
variance over the mean may seem like the goal of such transformations,
this may be unreasonable in the case of datasets with many true
differences due to the experimental conditions.
```{r meansd}
# this gives log2(n + 1)
ntd <- normTransform(dds)
library("vsn")
meanSdPlot(assay(ntd))
meanSdPlot(assay(vsd))
meanSdPlot(assay(rld))
```
## Data quality assessment by sample clustering and visualization
Data quality assessment and quality control (i.e. the removal of
insufficiently good data) are essential steps of any data
analysis. These steps should typically be performed
very early in the analysis of a new data set,
preceding or in parallel to the differential expression testing.
We define the term *quality* as *fitness for purpose*.
Our purpose is the detection of differentially expressed genes, and we
are looking in particular for samples whose experimental treatment
suffered from an anormality that renders the data points obtained from
these particular samples detrimental to our purpose.
### Heatmap of the count matrix
To explore a count matrix, it is often instructive to look at it as a
heatmap. Below we show how to produce such a heatmap for various
transformations of the data.
```{r heatmap}
library("pheatmap")
select <- order(rowMeans(counts(dds,normalized=TRUE)),
decreasing=TRUE)[1:20]
df <- as.data.frame(colData(dds)[,c("condition","type")])
pheatmap(assay(ntd)[select,], cluster_rows=FALSE, show_rownames=FALSE,
cluster_cols=FALSE, annotation_col=df)
pheatmap(assay(vsd)[select,], cluster_rows=FALSE, show_rownames=FALSE,
cluster_cols=FALSE, annotation_col=df)
pheatmap(assay(rld)[select,], cluster_rows=FALSE, show_rownames=FALSE,
cluster_cols=FALSE, annotation_col=df)
```
### Heatmap of the sample-to-sample distances
Another use of the transformed data is sample clustering. Here, we
apply the *dist* function to the transpose of the transformed count
matrix to get sample-to-sample distances.
```{r sampleClust}
sampleDists <- dist(t(assay(vsd)))
```
A heatmap of this distance matrix gives us an overview over
similarities and dissimilarities between samples. We have to provide
a hierarchical clustering `hc` to the heatmap function based on the
sample distances, or else the heatmap function would calculate a
clustering based on the distances between the rows/columns of the
distance matrix.
```{r figHeatmapSamples, fig.height=4, fig.width=6}
library("RColorBrewer")
sampleDistMatrix <- as.matrix(sampleDists)
rownames(sampleDistMatrix) <- paste(vsd$condition, vsd$type, sep="-")
colnames(sampleDistMatrix) <- NULL
colors <- colorRampPalette( rev(brewer.pal(9, "Blues")) )(255)
pheatmap(sampleDistMatrix,
clustering_distance_rows=sampleDists,
clustering_distance_cols=sampleDists,
col=colors)
```
### Principal component plot of the samples
Related to the distance matrix is the PCA plot, which shows
the samples in the 2D plane spanned by their first two principal
components. This type of plot is useful for visualizing the overall
effect of experimental covariates and batch effects.
```{r figPCA}
plotPCA(vsd, intgroup=c("condition", "type"))
```
It is also possible to customize the PCA plot using the
*ggplot* function.
```{r figPCA2}
pcaData <- plotPCA(vsd, intgroup=c("condition", "type"), returnData=TRUE)
percentVar <- round(100 * attr(pcaData, "percentVar"))
ggplot(pcaData, aes(PC1, PC2, color=condition, shape=type)) +
geom_point(size=3) +
xlab(paste0("PC1: ",percentVar[1],"% variance")) +
ylab(paste0("PC2: ",percentVar[2],"% variance")) +
coord_fixed()
```
# Variations to the standard workflow
## Wald test individual steps
The function *DESeq* runs the following functions in order:
```{r WaldTest, eval=FALSE}
dds <- estimateSizeFactors(dds)
dds <- estimateDispersions(dds)
dds <- nbinomWaldTest(dds)
```
<a name="contrasts"/>
## Contrasts
A contrast is a linear combination of estimated log2 fold changes,
which can be used to test if differences between groups are equal to
zero. The simplest use case for contrasts is an experimental design
containing a factor with three levels, say A, B and C. Contrasts
enable the user to generate results for all 3 possible differences:
log2 fold change of B vs A, of C vs A, and of C vs B.
The `contrast` argument of *results* function is
used to extract test results of log2 fold changes of interest, for example:
```{r simpleContrast, eval=FALSE}
results(dds, contrast=c("condition","C","B"))
```
Log2 fold changes can also be added and subtracted by providing a
`list` to the `contrast` argument which has two elements:
the names of the log2 fold changes to add, and the names of the log2
fold changes to subtract. The names used in the list should come from
`resultsNames(dds)`.
Alternatively, a numeric vector of the
length of `resultsNames(dds)` can be provided, for manually
specifying the linear combination of terms. Demonstrations of the use
of contrasts for various designs can be found in the examples section
of the help page for the *results* function. The
mathematical formula that is used to generate the contrasts can be
found [below](#theory).
<a name="interactions"/>
## Interactions
Interaction terms can be added to the design formula, in order to
test, for example, if the log2 fold change attributable to a given
condition is *different* based on another factor, for example if the
condition effect differs across genotype.
Many users begin to add interaction terms to the design formula, when
in fact a much simpler approach would give all the results tables that
are desired. We will explain this approach first, because it is much
simpler to perform.
If the comparisons of interest are, for example, the effect
of a condition for different sets of samples, a simpler approach than
adding interaction terms explicitly to the design formula is to
perform the following steps:
* combine the factors of interest into a single factor with all
combinations of the original factors
* change the design to include just this factor, e.g. ~ group
Using this design is similar to adding an interaction term,
in that it models multiple condition effects which
can be easily extracted with *results*.
Suppose we have two factors `genotype` (with values I, II, and III)
and `condition` (with values A and B), and we want to extract
the condition effect specifically for each genotype. We could use the
following approach to obtain, e.g. the condition effect for genotype I:
```{r combineFactors, eval=FALSE}
dds$group <- factor(paste0(dds$genotype, dds$condition))
design(dds) <- ~ group
dds <- DESeq(dds)
resultsNames(dds)
results(dds, contrast=c("group", "IB", "IA"))
```
The following two plots diagram hypothetical genotype-specific
condition effects, which could be modeled with interaction terms by
using a design of `~genotype + condition + genotype:condition`.
In the first plot (Gene 1), note that the condition effect
is consistent across genotypes. Although condition A has a different
baseline for I,II, and III, the condition effect is a log2 fold
change of about 2 for each genotype. Using a model with an
interaction term `genotype:condition`, the interaction terms for
genotype II and genotype III will be nearly 0.
Here, the y-axis represents log2(n+1), and each
group has 20 samples (black dots). A red line connects the mean of the
groups within each genotype.
```{r interFig, echo=FALSE, results="hide", fig.height=3}
npg <- 20
mu <- 2^c(8,10,9,11,10,12)
cond <- rep(rep(c("A","B"),each=npg),3)
geno <- rep(c("I","II","III"),each=2*npg)
table(cond, geno)
counts <- rnbinom(6*npg, mu=rep(mu,each=npg), size=1/.01)
d <- data.frame(log2c=log2(counts+1), cond, geno)
library("ggplot2")
plotit <- function(d, title) {
ggplot(d, aes(x=cond, y=log2c, group=geno)) +
geom_jitter(size=1.5, position = position_jitter(width=.15)) +
facet_wrap(~ geno) +
stat_summary(fun.y=mean, geom="line", colour="red", size=0.8) +
xlab("condition") + ylab("log2(counts+1)") + ggtitle(title)
}
plotit(d, "Gene 1") + ylim(7,13)
lm(log2c ~ cond + geno + geno:cond, data=d)
```
In the second plot
(Gene 2), we can see that the condition effect is not consistent
across genotype. Here the main condition effect (the effect for the
reference genotype I) is again 2. However, this time the interaction
terms will be around 1 for genotype II and -4 for genotype III. This
is because the condition effect is higher by 1 for genotype II
compared to genotype I, and lower by 4 for genotype III compared to
genotype I. The condition effect for genotype II (or III) is
obtained by adding the main condition effect and the interaction
term for that genotype. Such a plot can be made using the
*plotCounts* function as shown above.
```{r interFig2, echo=FALSE, results="hide", fig.height=3}
mu[4] <- 2^12
mu[6] <- 2^8
counts <- rnbinom(6*npg, mu=rep(mu,each=npg), size=1/.01)
d2 <- data.frame(log2c=log2(counts + 1), cond, geno)
plotit(d2, "Gene 2") + ylim(7,13)
lm(log2c ~ cond + geno + geno:cond, data=d2)
```
Now we will continue to explain the use of interactions in order to
test for *differences* in condition effects. We continue with
the example of condition effects across three genotypes (I, II, and III).
The key point to remember about designs with interaction terms is
that, unlike for a design `~genotype + condition`, where the condition
effect represents the
*overall* effect controlling for differences due to genotype, by adding
`genotype:condition`, the main condition effect only
represents the effect of condition for the *reference level* of
genotype (I, or whichever level was defined by the user as the
reference level). The interaction terms `genotypeII.conditionB`
and `genotypeIII.conditionB` give the *difference*
between the condition effect for a given genotype and the condition
effect for the reference genotype.
This genotype-condition interaction example is examined in further
detail in Example 3 in the help page for *results*, which
can be found by typing `?results`. In particular, we show how to
test for differences in the condition effect across genotype, and we
show how to obtain the condition effect for non-reference genotypes.
## Time-series experiments
There are a number of ways to analyze time-series experiments,
depending on the biological question of interest. In order to test for
any differences over multiple time points, once can use a design
including the time factor, and then test using the likelihood ratio
test as described in the following section, where the time factor is
removed in the reduced formula. For a control and treatment time
series, one can use a design formula containing the condition factor,
the time factor, and the interaction of the two. In this case, using
the likelihood ratio test with a reduced model which does not contain
the interaction terms will test whether the condition induces a change
in gene expression at any time point after the reference level time point
(time 0). An example of the later analysis is provided in our
[RNA-seq workflow](http://www.bioconductor.org/help/workflows/rnaseqGene).
## Likelihood ratio test
DESeq2 offers two kinds of hypothesis tests: the Wald test, where
we use the estimated standard error of a log2 fold change to test if it is
equal to zero, and the likelihood ratio test (LRT). The LRT examines
two models for the counts, a *full* model with a certain number
of terms and a *reduced* model, in which some of the terms of the
*full* model are removed. The test determines if the increased
likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the *full* model
is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero.
The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple
terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once,
or all interactions between two variables.
The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA)
calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative
Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the
*deviance* captures the difference in likelihood between a full
and a reduced model.
The likelihood ratio test can be performed by specifying `test="LRT"`
when using the *DESeq* function, and
providing a reduced design formula, e.g. one in which a
number of terms from `design(dds)` are removed.
The degrees of freedom for the test is obtained from the difference
between the number of parameters in the two models.
A simple likelihood ratio test, if the full design was
`~condition` would look like:
```{r simpleLRT, eval=FALSE}
dds <- DESeq(dds, test="LRT", reduced=~1)
res <- results(dds)
```
If the full design contained other variables,
such as a batch variable, e.g. `~batch + condition`
then the likelihood ratio test would look like:
```{r simpleLRT2, eval=FALSE}
dds <- DESeq(dds, test="LRT", reduced=~batch)
res <- results(dds)
```
<a name="outlier"/>
## Approach to count outliers
RNA-seq data sometimes contain isolated instances of very large counts
that are apparently unrelated to the experimental or study design, and
which may be considered outliers. There are many reasons why outliers
can arise, including rare technical or experimental artifacts, read
mapping problems in the case of genetically differing samples, and
genuine, but rare biological events. In many cases, users appear
primarily interested in genes that show a consistent behavior, and
this is the reason why by default, genes that are affected by such
outliers are set aside by DESeq2, or if there are sufficient samples,
outlier counts are replaced for model fitting. These two behaviors
are described below.
The *DESeq* function calculates, for every gene and for every sample,
a diagnostic test for outliers called *Cook's distance*. Cook's distance
is a measure of how much a single sample is influencing the fitted
coefficients for a gene, and a large value of Cook's distance is
intended to indicate an outlier count.
The Cook's distances are stored as a matrix available in
`assays(dds)[["cooks"]]`.
The *results* function automatically flags genes which contain a
Cook's distance above a cutoff for samples which have 3 or more replicates.
The *p* values and adjusted *p* values for these genes are set to `NA`.
At least 3 replicates are required for flagging, as it is difficult to judge
which sample might be an outlier with only 2 replicates.
This filtering can be turned off with `results(dds, cooksCutoff=FALSE)`.
With many degrees of freedom -- i.\,e., many more samples than number of parameters to
be estimated -- it is undesirable to remove entire genes from the analysis
just because their data include a single count outlier. When there
are 7 or more replicates for a given sample, the *DESeq*
function will automatically replace counts with large Cook's distance
with the trimmed mean over all samples, scaled up by the size factor or
normalization factor for that sample. This approach is conservative,
it will not lead to false positives, as it replaces
the outlier value with the value predicted by the null hypothesis.
This outlier replacement only occurs when there are 7 or more
replicates, and can be turned off with
`DESeq(dds, minReplicatesForReplace=Inf)`.
The default Cook's distance cutoff for the two behaviors described above
depends on the sample size and number of parameters
to be estimated. The default is to use the 99% quantile of the
F(p,m-p) distribution (with *p* the number of parameters including the
intercept and *m* number of samples).
The default for gene flagging can be modified using the `cooksCutoff`
argument to the *results* function.
For outlier replacement, *DESeq* preserves the original counts in
`counts(dds)` saving the replacement counts as a matrix named
`replaceCounts` in `assays(dds)`.
Note that with continuous variables in the design, outlier detection
and replacement is not automatically performed, as our
current methods involve a robust estimation of within-group variance
which does not extend easily to continuous covariates. However, users
can examine the Cook's distances in `assays(dds)[["cooks"]]`, in
order to perform manual visualization and filtering if necessary.
**Note on many outliers:** if there are very many outliers (e.g. many
hundreds or thousands) reported by `summary(res)`, one might consider
further exploration to see if a single sample or a few samples should
be removed due to low quality. The automatic outlier
filtering/replacement is most useful in situations which the number of
outliers is limited. When there are thousands of reported outliers, it
might make more sense to turn off the outlier filtering/replacement
(*DESeq* with `minReplicatesForReplace=Inf` and *results* with
`cooksCutoff=FALSE`) and perform manual inspection: First it would be
advantageous to make a PCA plot as described above to spot individual
sample outliers; Second, one can make a boxplot of the Cook's
distances to see if one sample is consistently higher than others
(here this is not the case):
```{r boxplotCooks}
par(mar=c(8,5,2,2))
boxplot(log10(assays(dds)[["cooks"]]), range=0, las=2)
```
## Dispersion plot and fitting alternatives
Plotting the dispersion estimates is a useful diagnostic. The dispersion
plot below is typical, with the final estimates shrunk
from the gene-wise estimates towards the fitted estimates. Some gene-wise
estimates are flagged as outliers and not shrunk towards the fitted value,
(this outlier detection is described in the manual page for *estimateDispersionsMAP*).
The amount of shrinkage can be more or less than seen here, depending
on the sample size, the number of coefficients, the row mean
and the variability of the gene-wise estimates.
```{r dispFit}
plotDispEsts(dds)
```
### Local or mean dispersion fit
A local smoothed dispersion fit is automatically substitited in the case that
the parametric curve doesn't fit the observed dispersion mean relationship.
This can be prespecified by providing the argument
`fitType="local"` to either *DESeq* or *estimateDispersions*.
Additionally, using the mean of gene-wise disperion estimates as the
fitted value can be specified by providing the argument `fitType="mean"`.
### Supply a custom dispersion fit
Any fitted values can be provided during dispersion estimation, using
the lower-level functions described in the manual page for
*estimateDispersionsGeneEst*. In the code chunk below, we
store the gene-wise estimates which were already calculated and saved
in the metadata column `dispGeneEst`. Then we calculate the
median value of the dispersion estimates above a threshold, and save
these values as the fitted dispersions, using the replacement function
for *dispersionFunction*. In the last line, the function
*estimateDispersionsMAP*, uses the
fitted dispersions to generate maximum *a posteriori* (MAP)
estimates of dispersion.
```{r dispFitCustom}
ddsCustom <- dds
useForMedian <- mcols(ddsCustom)$dispGeneEst > 1e-7
medianDisp <- median(mcols(ddsCustom)$dispGeneEst[useForMedian],
na.rm=TRUE)
dispersionFunction(ddsCustom) <- function(mu) medianDisp
ddsCustom <- estimateDispersionsMAP(ddsCustom)
```
<a name="indfilt"/>
## Independent filtering of results
The *results* function of the DESeq2 package performs independent
filtering by default using the mean of normalized counts as a filter
statistic. A threshold on the filter statistic is found which
optimizes the number of adjusted *p* values lower than a significance
level `alpha` (we use the standard variable name for significance
level, though it is unrelated to the dispersion parameter $\alpha$).
The theory behind independent filtering is discussed in greater detail
[below](#indfilttheory). The adjusted *p* values for the genes
which do not pass the filter threshold are set to `NA`.
The default independent filtering is performed using the *filtered_p*
function of the [genefilter](http://bioconductor.org/packages/genefilter) package, and all of the
arguments of *filtered_p* can be passed to the *results* function.
The filter threshold value and the number of rejections at each
quantile of the filter statistic are available as metadata of the
object returned by *results*.
For example, we can visualize the optimization by plotting the
`filterNumRej` attribute of the results object. The *results* function
maximizes the number of rejections (adjusted *p* value less than a
significance level), over the quantiles of a filter statistic (the
mean of normalized counts). The threshold chosen (vertical line) is
the lowest quantile of the filter for which the number of rejections
is within 1 residual standard deviation to the peak of a curve fit to
the number of rejections over the filter quantiles:
```{r filtByMean}
metadata(res)$alpha
metadata(res)$filterThreshold
plot(metadata(res)$filterNumRej,
type="b", ylab="number of rejections",
xlab="quantiles of filter")
lines(metadata(res)$lo.fit, col="red")
abline(v=metadata(res)$filterTheta)
```
Independent filtering can be turned off by setting
`independentFiltering` to `FALSE`.
```{r noFilt}
resNoFilt <- results(dds, independentFiltering=FALSE)
addmargins(table(filtering=(res$padj < .1),
noFiltering=(resNoFilt$padj < .1)))
```
## Tests of log2 fold change above or below a threshold
It is also possible to provide thresholds for constructing
Wald tests of significance. Two arguments to the *results*
function allow for threshold-based Wald tests: `lfcThreshold`,
which takes a numeric of a non-negative threshold value,
and `altHypothesis`, which specifies the kind of test.
Note that the *alternative hypothesis* is specified by the user,
i.e. those genes which the user is interested in finding, and the test
provides *p* values for the null hypothesis, the complement of the set
defined by the alternative. The `altHypothesis` argument can take one
of the following four values, where $\beta$ is the log2 fold change
specified by the `name` argument, and $x$ is the `lfcThreshold`.
* `greaterAbs` - $|\beta| > x$ - tests are two-tailed
* `lessAbs` - $|\beta| < x$ - *p* values are the maximum of the upper and lower tests
* `greater` - $\beta > x$
* `less` - $\beta < -x$
The four possible values of `altHypothesis` are demonstrated
in the following code and visually by MA-plots in the following figures.
```{r lfcThresh}
par(mfrow=c(2,2),mar=c(2,2,1,1))
ylim <- c(-2.5,2.5)
resGA <- results(dds, lfcThreshold=.5, altHypothesis="greaterAbs")
resLA <- results(dds, lfcThreshold=.5, altHypothesis="lessAbs")
resG <- results(dds, lfcThreshold=.5, altHypothesis="greater")
resL <- results(dds, lfcThreshold=.5, altHypothesis="less")
drawLines <- function() abline(h=c(-.5,.5),col="dodgerblue",lwd=2)
plotMA(resGA, ylim=ylim); drawLines()
plotMA(resLA, ylim=ylim); drawLines()
plotMA(resG, ylim=ylim); drawLines()
plotMA(resL, ylim=ylim); drawLines()
```
<a name="access"/>
## Access to all calculated values
All row-wise calculated values (intermediate dispersion calculations,
coefficients, standard errors, etc.) are stored in the *DESeqDataSet*
object, e.g. `dds` in this vignette. These values are accessible
by calling *mcols* on `dds`.
Descriptions of the columns are accessible by two calls to
*mcols*. Note that the call to `substr` below is only for display
purposes.
```{r mcols}
mcols(dds,use.names=TRUE)[1:4,1:4]
substr(names(mcols(dds)),1,10)
mcols(mcols(dds), use.names=TRUE)[1:4,]
```
The mean values $\mu_{ij} = s_j q_{ij}$ and the Cook's distances for each gene and
sample are stored as matrices in the assays slot:
```{r muAndCooks}
head(assays(dds)[["mu"]])
head(assays(dds)[["cooks"]])
```
The dispersions $\alpha_i$ can be accessed with the
*dispersions* function.
```{r dispersions}
head(dispersions(dds))
head(mcols(dds)$dispersion)
```
The size factors $s_j$ are accessible via *sizeFactors*:
```{r sizefactors}
sizeFactors(dds)
```
For advanced users, we also include a convenience function *coef* for
extracting the matrix $[\beta_{ir}]$ for all genes *i* and
model coefficients $r$.
This function can also return a matrix of standard errors, see `?coef`.
The columns of this matrix correspond to the effects returned by *resultsNames*.
Note that the *results* function is best for building
results tables with *p* values and adjusted *p* values.
```{r coef}
head(coef(dds))
```
The beta prior variance $\sigma_r^2$ is stored as an attribute of the
*DESeqDataSet*:
```{r betaPriorVar}
attr(dds, "betaPriorVar")
```
General information about the prior used for log fold change shrinkage
is also stored in a slot of the *DESeqResults* object. This would
also contain information about what other packages were used
for log2 fold change shrinkage.
```{r priorInfo}
priorInfo(resLFC)
priorInfo(resApe)
priorInfo(resAsh)
```
The dispersion prior variance $\sigma_d^2$ is stored as an
attribute of the dispersion function:
```{r dispPriorVar}
dispersionFunction(dds)
attr(dispersionFunction(dds), "dispPriorVar")
```
The version of DESeq2 which was used to construct the
*DESeqDataSet* object, or the version used when
*DESeq* was run, is stored here:
```{r versionNum}
metadata(dds)[["version"]]
```
## Sample-/gene-dependent normalization factors
In some experiments, there might be gene-dependent dependencies
which vary across samples. For instance, GC-content bias or length
bias might vary across samples coming from different labs or
processed at different times. We use the terms *normalization factors*
for a gene x sample matrix, and *size factors* for a
single number per sample. Incorporating normalization factors,
the mean parameter $\mu_{ij}$ becomes:
$$ \mu_{ij} = NF_{ij} q_{ij} $$
with normalization factor matrix *NF* having the same dimensions
as the counts matrix *K*. This matrix can be incorporated as shown
below. We recommend providing a matrix with row-wise geometric means of 1,
so that the mean of normalized counts for a gene is close to the mean
of the unnormalized counts.
This can be accomplished by dividing out the current row geometric means.
```{r normFactors, eval=FALSE}
normFactors <- normFactors / exp(rowMeans(log(normFactors)))
normalizationFactors(dds) <- normFactors
```
These steps then replace *estimateSizeFactors* which occurs within the
*DESeq* function. The *DESeq* function will look for pre-existing
normalization factors and use these in the place of size factors
(and a message will be printed confirming this).
The methods provided by the
[cqn](http://bioconductor.org/packages/cqn) or
[EDASeq](http://bioconductor.org/packages/EDASeq) packages
can help correct for GC or length biases. They both describe in their
vignettes how to create matrices which can be used by DESeq2.
From the formula above, we see that normalization factors should be on
the scale of the counts, like size factors, and unlike offsets which
are typically on the scale of the predictors (i.e. the logarithmic scale for
the negative binomial GLM). At the time of writing, the transformation
from the matrices provided by these packages should be:
```{r offsetTransform, eval=FALSE}
cqnOffset <- cqnObject$glm.offset
cqnNormFactors <- exp(cqnOffset)
EDASeqNormFactors <- exp(-1 * EDASeqOffset)
```
## "Model matrix not full rank"
While most experimental designs run easily using design formula, some
design formulas can cause problems and result in the *DESeq*
function returning an error with the text: "the model matrix is not
full rank, so the model cannot be fit as specified." There are two
main reasons for this problem: either one or more columns in the model
matrix are linear combinations of other columns, or there are levels
of factors or combinations of levels of multiple factors which are
missing samples. We address these two problems below and discuss
possible solutions:
### Linear combinations
The simplest case is the linear combination, or linear dependency
problem, when two variables contain exactly the same information, such
as in the following sample table. The software cannot fit an effect
for `batch` and `condition`, because they produce
identical columns in the model matrix. This is also referred to as
*perfect confounding*. A unique solution of coefficients (the $\beta_i$ in
the formula [below](#theory)) is not possible.
```{r lineardep, echo=FALSE}
DataFrame(batch=factor(c(1,1,2,2)), condition=factor(c("A","A","B","B")))
```
Another situation which will cause problems is when the variables are
not identical, but one variable can be formed by the combination of
other factor levels. In the following example, the effect of batch 2
vs 1 cannot be fit because it is identical to a column in the model
matrix which represents the condition C vs A effect.
```{r lineardep2, echo=FALSE}
DataFrame(batch=factor(c(1,1,1,1,2,2)), condition=factor(c("A","A","B","B","C","C")))
```
In both of these cases above, the batch effect cannot be fit and must
be removed from the model formula. There is just no way to tell apart
the condition effects and the batch effects. The options are either to assume
there is no batch effect (which we know is highly unlikely given the
literature on batch effects in sequencing datasets) or to repeat the
experiment and properly balance the conditions across batches.
A balanced design would look like:
```{r lineardep3, echo=FALSE}
DataFrame(batch=factor(c(1,1,1,2,2,2)), condition=factor(c("A","B","C","A","B","C")))
```
<a name="nested-indiv"/>
### Group-specific condition effects, individuals nested within groups
Finally, there is a case where we *can* in fact perform inference, but
we may need to re-arrange terms to do so. Consider an experiment with
grouped individuals, where we seek to test the group-specific effect
of a condition or treatment, while controlling for individual
effects. The individuals are nested within the groups: an individual
can only be in one of the groups, although each individual has one or
more observations across condition.
An example of such an experiment is below:
```{r groupeffect}
coldata <- DataFrame(grp=factor(rep(c("X","Y"),each=6)),
ind=factor(rep(1:6,each=2)),
cnd=factor(rep(c("A","B"),6)))
coldata
```
Note that individual (`ind`) is a *factor* not a numeric. This is very
important.
To make R display all the rows, we can do:
```{r}
as.data.frame(coldata)
```
We have two groups of samples X and Y, each with three distinct
individuals (labeled here 1-6). For each individual, we have
conditions A and B (for example, this could be control and treated).
This design can be analyzed by DESeq2 but requires a bit of
refactoring in order to fit the model terms. Here we will use a trick
described in the [edgeR](http://bioconductor.org/packages/edgeR) user
guide, from the section
*Comparisons Both Between and Within Subjects*. If we try to
analyze with a formula such as, `~ ind + grp*cnd`, we will
obtain an error, because the effect for group is a linear combination
of the individuals.
However, the following steps allow for an analysis of group-specific
condition effects, while controlling for differences in individual.
For object construction, you can use a simple design, such as
`~ ind + cnd`, as
long as you remember to replace it before running *DESeq*.
Then add a column `ind.n` which distinguishes the
individuals nested within a group. Here, we add this column to
coldata, but in practice you would add this column to `dds`.
```{r groupeffect2}
coldata$ind.n <- factor(rep(rep(1:3,each=2),2))
as.data.frame(coldata)
```
Now we can reassign our *DESeqDataSet* a design of
`~ grp + grp:ind.n + grp:cnd`, before we call
*DESeq*. This new design will result in the following model
matrix:
```{r groupeffect3}
model.matrix(~ grp + grp:ind.n + grp:cnd, coldata)
```
Note that, if you have unbalanced numbers of individuals in the two
groups, you will have zeros for some of the interactions between `grp`
and `ind.n`. You can remove these columns manually from the model
matrix and pass the corrected model matrix to the `full` argument of
the *DESeq* function. See example code in the next section.
Above, the terms `grpX.cndB` and `grpY.cndB` give the
group-specific condition effects, in other words, the condition B vs A
effect for group X samples, and likewise for group Y samples. These
terms control for all of the six individual effects.
These group-specific condition effects can be extracted using
*results* with the `name` argument.
Furthermore, `grpX.cndB` and `grpY.cndB` can be contrasted using the
`contrast` argument, in order to test if the condition effect is
different across group:
```{r groupeffect4, eval=FALSE}
results(dds, contrast=list("grpY.cndB","grpX.cndB"))
```
### Levels without samples
The base R function for creating model matrices will produce a column
of zeros if a level is missing from a factor or a combination of
levels is missing from an interaction of factors. The solution to the
first case is to call *droplevels* on the column, which will
remove levels without samples. This was shown in the beginning of this
vignette.
The second case is also solvable, by manually editing the model
matrix, and then providing this to *DESeq*. Here we
construct an example dataset to illustrate:
```{r missingcombo}
group <- factor(rep(1:3,each=6))
condition <- factor(rep(rep(c("A","B","C"),each=2),3))
d <- DataFrame(group, condition)[-c(17,18),]
as.data.frame(d)
```
Note that if we try to estimate all interaction terms, we introduce a
column with all zeros, as there are no condition C samples for group
3. (Here, *unname* is used to display the matrix concisely.)
```{r missingcombo2}
m1 <- model.matrix(~ condition*group, d)
colnames(m1)
unname(m1)
all.zero <- apply(m1, 2, function(x) all(x==0))
all.zero
```
We can remove this column like so:
```{r missingcombo3}
idx <- which(all.zero)
m1 <- m1[,-idx]
unname(m1)
```
Now this matrix `m1` can be provided to the `full`
argument of *DESeq*. For a likelihood ratio test of
interactions, a model matrix using a reduced design such as
`~ condition + group` can be given to the `reduced`
argument. Wald tests can also be generated instead of the likelihood
ratio test, but for user-supplied model matrices, the argument
`betaPrior` must be set to `FALSE`.
<a name="theory"/>
# Theory behind DESeq2
## The DESeq2 model
The DESeq2 model and all the steps taken in the software
are described in detail in our publication [@Love2014],
and we include the formula and descriptions in this section as well.
The differential expression analysis in DESeq2 uses a generalized
linear model of the form:
$$ K_{ij} \sim \textrm{NB}(\mu_{ij}, \alpha_i) $$
$$ \mu_{ij} = s_j q_{ij} $$
$$ \log_2(q_{ij}) = x_{j.} \beta_i $$
where counts $K_{ij}$ for gene *i*, sample *j* are modeled using
a negative binomial distribution with fitted mean $\mu_{ij}$
and a gene-specific dispersion parameter $\alpha_i$.
The fitted mean is composed of a sample-specific size factor
$s_j$ and a parameter $q_{ij}$
proportional to the expected true concentration of fragments for sample *j*.
The coefficients $\beta_i$ give the log2 fold changes for gene *i* for each
column of the model matrix $X$.
Note that the model can be generalized to use sample- and
gene-dependent normalization factors $s_{ij}$.
The dispersion parameter $\alpha_i$ defines the relationship between
the variance of the observed count and its mean value. In other
words, how far do we expected the observed count will be from the
mean value, which depends both on the size factor $s_j$ and the
covariate-dependent part $q_{ij}$ as defined above.
$$ \textrm{Var}(K_{ij}) = E[ (K_{ij} - \mu_{ij})^2 ] = \mu_{ij} + \alpha_i \mu_{ij}^2 $$
An option in DESeq2 is to provide maximum *a posteriori*
estimates of the log2 fold changes in $\beta_i$ after incorporating a
zero-centered Normal prior (`betaPrior`). While previously,
these moderated, or shrunken, estimates were generated by
*DESeq* or *nbinomWaldTest* functions, they are now produced by the
*lfcShrink* function.
Dispersions are estimated using expected mean values from the maximum
likelihood estimate of log2 fold changes, and optimizing the Cox-Reid
adjusted profile likelihood, as first implemented for RNA-seq data in
[edgeR](http://bioconductor.org/packages/edgeR)
[@CR,edgeR_GLM]. The steps performed by the *DESeq* function are
documented in its manual page `?DESeq`; briefly, they are:
1) estimation of size factors $s_j$ by *estimateSizeFactors*
2) estimation of dispersion $\alpha_i$ by *estimateDispersions*
3) negative binomial GLM fitting for $\beta_i$ and Wald statistics by
*nbinomWaldTest*
For access to all the values calculated during these steps, see the
section [above](#access).
## Changes compared to DESeq
The main changes in the package *DESeq2*, compared to the (older)
version *DESeq*, are as follows:
* *RangedSummarizedExperiment* is used as the superclass for storage of input data,
intermediate calculations and results.
* Optional, maximum *a posteriori* estimation of GLM coefficients
incorporating a zero-centered Normal prior with variance estimated
from data (equivalent to Tikhonov/ridge regularization). This
adjustment has little effect on genes with high counts, yet it helps
to moderate the otherwise large variance in log2 fold change
estimates for genes with low counts or highly variable counts.
These estimates are now provided by the *lfcShrink* function.
* Maximum *a posteriori* estimation of dispersion replaces the
`sharingMode` options `fit-only` or `maximum` of the previous version
of the package. This is similar to the dispersion estimation methods of DSS [@Wu2012New].
* All estimation and inference is based on the generalized linear model, which
includes the two condition case (previously the *exact test* was used).
* The Wald test for significance of GLM coefficients is provided as the default
inference method, with the likelihood ratio test of the previous version still available.
* It is possible to provide a matrix of sample-/gene-dependent
normalization factors.
* Automatic independent filtering on the mean of normalized counts.
* Automatic outlier detection and handling.
<a name="changes"/>
## Methods changes since the 2014 DESeq2 paper
* In version 1.18 (November 2017), we add two
[alternative shrinkage estimators](#alternative-shrinkage-estimators),
which can be used via `lfcShrink`: an estimator using a t prior from
the apeglm packages, and an estimator with a fitted mixture of
normals prior from the ashr package.
* In version 1.16 (November 2016), the log2 fold change
shrinkage is no longer default for the *DESeq* and *nbinomWaldTest*
functions, by setting the defaults of these to `betaPrior=FALSE`,
and by introducing a separate function *lfcShrink*, which performs
log2 fold change shrinkage for visualization and ranking of genes.
While for the majority of bulk RNA-seq experiments, the LFC
shrinkage did not affect statistical testing, DESeq2 has become used
as an inference engine by a wider community, and certain sequencing
datasets show better performance with the testing separated from the
use of the LFC prior. Also, the separation of LFC shrinkage to a separate
function `lfcShrink` allows for easier methods development of
alternative effect size estimators.
* A small change to the independent filtering routine: instead
of taking the quantile of the filter (the mean of normalized counts) which
directly *maximizes* the number of rejections, the threshold chosen is
the lowest quantile of the filter for which the
number of rejections is close to the peak of a curve fit
to the number of rejections over the filter quantiles.
``Close to'' is defined as within 1 residual standard deviation.
This change was introduced in version 1.10 (October 2015).
* For the calculation of the beta prior variance, instead of
matching the empirical quantile to the quantile of a Normal
distribution, DESeq2 now uses the weighted quantile function
of the Hmisc package. The weighting is described in the
manual page for *nbinomWaldTest*. The weights are the
inverse of the expected variance of log counts (as used in the
diagonals of the matrix $W$ in the GLM). The effect of the change
is that the estimated prior variance is robust against noisy
estimates of log fold change from genes with very small
counts. This change was introduced in version 1.6 (October 2014).
For a list of all changes since version 1.0.0, see the `NEWS` file
included in the package.
## Count outlier detection
DESeq2 relies on the negative binomial distribution to make
estimates and perform statistical inference on differences. While the
negative binomial is versatile in having a mean and dispersion
parameter, extreme counts in individual samples might not fit well to
the negative binomial. For this reason, we perform automatic detection
of count outliers. We use Cook's distance, which is a measure of how
much the fitted coefficients would change if an individual sample were
removed [@Cook1977Detection]. For more on the implementation of
Cook's distance see the manual page
for the *results* function. Below we plot the maximum value of
Cook's distance for each row over the rank of the test statistic
to justify its use as a filtering criterion.
```{r cooksPlot}
W <- res$stat
maxCooks <- apply(assays(dds)[["cooks"]],1,max)
idx <- !is.na(W)
plot(rank(W[idx]), maxCooks[idx], xlab="rank of Wald statistic",
ylab="maximum Cook's distance per gene",
ylim=c(0,5), cex=.4, col=rgb(0,0,0,.3))
m <- ncol(dds)
p <- 3
abline(h=qf(.99, p, m - p))
```
## Contrasts
Contrasts can be calculated for a *DESeqDataSet* object for which
the GLM coefficients have already been fit using the Wald test steps
(*DESeq* with `test="Wald"` or using *nbinomWaldTest*).
The vector of coefficients $\beta$ is left multiplied by the contrast vector $c$
to form the numerator of the test statistic. The denominator is formed by multiplying
the covariance matrix $\Sigma$ for the coefficients on either side by the
contrast vector $c$. The square root of this product is an estimate
of the standard error for the contrast. The contrast statistic is then compared
to a normal distribution as are the Wald statistics for the DESeq2
package.
$$ W = \frac{c^t \beta}{\sqrt{c^t \Sigma c}} $$
## Expanded model matrices
For the specific combination of `lfcShrink` with the type `normal` and
using `contrast`, DESeq2 uses *expanded model matrices* to produce
shrunken log2 fold change estimates where the shrinkage is independent
of the choice of reference level. In all other cases, DESeq2 uses
standard model matrices, as produced by `model.matrix`. The expanded
model matrices differ from the standard model matrices, in that they
have an indicator column (and therefore a coefficient) for each level
of factors in the design formula in addition to an intercept. This is
described in the DESeq2 paper, but the DESeq2 software package has
moved away from this approach, with more support for shrinkage of
individual coefficients (although the expanded model matrix approach
is still supported using the above combination of functions and
arguments).
<a name="indfilttheory"/>
## Independent filtering and multiple testing
### Filtering criteria
The goal of independent filtering is to filter out those tests from
the procedure that have no, or little chance of showing significant
evidence, without even looking at their test statistic. Typically,
this results in increased detection power at the same experiment-wide
type I error. Here, we measure experiment-wide type I error in terms
of the false discovery rate.
A good choice for a filtering criterion is one that
1) is statistically independent from the test statistic under the null hypothesis,
2) is correlated with the test statistic under the alternative, and
3) does not notably change the dependence structure -- if there is any -- between
the tests that pass the filter, compared to the dependence structure
between the tests before filtering.
The benefit from filtering relies on property (2), and we will explore
it further below. Its statistical validity relies on
property (1) -- which is simple to formally prove for many combinations
of filter criteria with test statistics -- and (3), which is less
easy to theoretically imply from first principles, but rarely a problem in practice.
We refer to [@Bourgon:2010:PNAS] for further discussion of this topic.
A simple filtering criterion readily available in the results object
is the mean of normalized counts irrespective of biological condition,
and so this is the criterion which is used automatically by the
*results* function to perform independent filtering. Genes with very
low counts are not likely to see significant differences typically due
to high dispersion. For example, we can plot the $-\log_{10}$ *p*
values from all genes over the normalized mean counts:
```{r indFilt}
plot(res$baseMean+1, -log10(res$pvalue),
log="x", xlab="mean of normalized counts",
ylab=expression(-log[10](pvalue)),
ylim=c(0,30),
cex=.4, col=rgb(0,0,0,.3))
```
### Why does it work?
Consider the *p* value histogram below
It shows how the filtering ameliorates the multiple testing problem
-- and thus the severity of a multiple testing adjustment -- by
removing a background set of hypotheses whose *p* values are distributed
more or less uniformly in [0,1].
```{r histindepfilt}
use <- res$baseMean > metadata(res)$filterThreshold
h1 <- hist(res$pvalue[!use], breaks=0:50/50, plot=FALSE)
h2 <- hist(res$pvalue[use], breaks=0:50/50, plot=FALSE)
colori <- c(`do not pass`="khaki", `pass`="powderblue")
```
Histogram of p values for all tests. The area shaded in blue
indicates the subset of those that pass the filtering, the area in
khaki those that do not pass:
```{r fighistindepfilt}
barplot(height = rbind(h1$counts, h2$counts), beside = FALSE,
col = colori, space = 0, main = "", ylab="frequency")
text(x = c(0, length(h1$counts)), y = 0, label = paste(c(0,1)),
adj = c(0.5,1.7), xpd=NA)
legend("topright", fill=rev(colori), legend=rev(names(colori)))
```
<a name="FAQ"/>
# Frequently asked questions
## How can I get support for DESeq2?
We welcome questions about our software, and want to
ensure that we eliminate issues if and when they appear. We have a few
requests to optimize the process:
* all questions should take place on the Bioconductor support
site: <https://support.bioconductor.org>, which serves as a
repository of questions and answers. This helps to save the
developers' time in responding to similar questions. Make sure to
tag your post with `deseq2`. It is often very helpful in addition
to describe the aim of your experiment.
* before posting, first search the Bioconductor support site
mentioned above for past threads which might have answered your
question.
* if you have a question about the behavior of a function, read
the sections of the manual page for this function by typing a
question mark and the function name, e.g. `?results`. We
spend a lot of time documenting individual functions and the exact
steps that the software is performing.
* include all of your R code, especially the creation of the
*DESeqDataSet* and the design formula. Include complete
warning or error messages, and conclude your message with the full
output of `sessionInfo()`.
* if possible, include the output of
`as.data.frame(colData(dds))`, so that we can have a sense
of the experimental setup. If this contains confidential
information, you can replace the levels of those factors using
*levels()*.
## Why are some *p* values set to NA?
See the details [above](#pvaluesNA).
## How can I get unfiltered DESeq2 results?
Users can obtain unfiltered GLM results, i.e. without outlier removal
or independent filtering with the following call:
```{r vanillaDESeq, eval=FALSE}
dds <- DESeq(dds, minReplicatesForReplace=Inf)
res <- results(dds, cooksCutoff=FALSE, independentFiltering=FALSE)
```
In this case, the only *p* values set to `NA` are those from
genes with all counts equal to zero.
## How do I use VST or rlog data for differential testing?
The variance stabilizing and rlog transformations are provided for
applications other than differential testing, for example clustering
of samples or other machine learning applications. For differential
testing we recommend the *DESeq* function applied to raw
counts as outlined [above](#de).
## Can I use DESeq2 to analyze paired samples?
Yes, you should use a multi-factor design which includes the sample
information as a term in the design formula. This will account for
differences between the samples while estimating the effect due to
the condition. The condition of interest should go at the end of the
design formula, e.g. `~ subject + condition`.
## If I have multiple groups, should I run all together or split into pairs of groups?
Typically, we recommend users to run samples from all groups together, and then
use the `contrast` argument of the *results* function
to extract comparisons of interest after fitting the model using *DESeq*.
The model fit by *DESeq* estimates a single dispersion
parameter for each gene, which defines how far we expect the observed
count for a sample will be from the mean value from the model
given its size factor and its condition group. See the section
[above](#theory) and the DESeq2 paper for full details.
Having a single dispersion parameter for each gene is usually
sufficient for analyzing multi-group data, as the final dispersion value will
incorporate the within-group variability across all groups.
However, for some datasets, exploratory data analysis (EDA) plots
could reveal that one or more groups has much
higher within-group variability than the others. A simulated example
of such a set of samples is shown below.
This is case where, by comparing groups A and B separately --
subsetting a *DESeqDataSet* to only samples from those two
groups and then running *DESeq* on this subset -- will be
more sensitive than a model including all samples together.
It should be noted that such an extreme range of within-group
variability is not common, although it could arise if certain
treatments produce an extreme reaction (e.g. cell death).
Again, this can be easily detected from the EDA plots such as PCA
described in this vignette.
Here we diagram an extreme range of within-group variability with a
simulated dataset. Typically, it is recommended to run *DESeq* across
samples from all groups, for datasets with multiple groups. However,
this simulated dataset shows a case where it would be preferable to
compare groups A and B by creating a smaller dataset without the C
samples. Group C has much higher within-group variability, which would
inflate the per-gene dispersion estimate for groups A and B as well:
```{r varGroup, echo=FALSE}
set.seed(3)
dds1 <- makeExampleDESeqDataSet(n=1000,m=12,betaSD=.3,dispMeanRel=function(x) 0.01)
dds2 <- makeExampleDESeqDataSet(n=1000,m=12,
betaSD=.3,
interceptMean=mcols(dds1)$trueIntercept,
interceptSD=0,
dispMeanRel=function(x) 0.2)
dds2 <- dds2[,7:12]
dds2$condition <- rep("C",6)
mcols(dds2) <- NULL
dds12 <- cbind(dds1, dds2)
rld <- rlog(dds12, blind=FALSE, fitType="mean")
plotPCA(rld)
```
## Can I run DESeq2 to contrast the levels of many groups?
DESeq2 will work with any kind of design specified using the R
formula. We enourage users to consider exploratory data analysis such
as principal components analysis rather than performing statistical
testing of all pairs of many groups of samples. Statistical testing is
one of many ways of describing differences between samples.
Regarding multiple test correction, if a user is planning to
contrast all pairs of many levels, and then selectively reporting the
results of only a *subset* of those pairs, one needs to perform multiple testing
across *contrasts* as well as genes to control for this additional
form of multiple testing. This can be done by using the `p.adjust`
function across a long vector of *p* values from all pairs of
contasts, then re-assigning these adjusted *p* values to the
appropriate results table.
As a speed concern with fitting very large models,
note that each additional level of a factor in the
design formula adds another parameter to the GLM which is fit by
DESeq2. Users might consider first removing genes with very few
reads, e.g. genes with row sum of 1, as this will speed up the
fitting procedure.
## Can I use DESeq2 to analyze a dataset without replicates?
If a *DESeqDataSet* is provided with an experimental design without replicates,
a warning is printed, that the samples are treated as replicates
for estimation of dispersion. This kind of analysis is
only useful for exploring the data, but will not provide the kind of
proper statistical inference on differences between groups.
Without biological replicates, it is not possible to estimate the biological
variability of each gene.
More details can be found in the manual page for `?DESeq`.
## How can I include a continuous covariate in the design formula?
Continuous covariates can be included in the design formula in exactly
the same manner as factorial covariates, and then *results* for the
continuous covariate can be extracted by specifying `name`.
Continuous covariates might make sense in certain experiments, where a
constant fold change might be
expected for each unit of the covariate. However, in many cases, more
meaningful results can be obtained by cutting continuous covariates
into a factor defined over a small number of bins (e.g. 3-5). In this
way, the average effect of each group is controlled for, regardless of
the trend over the continuous covariates. In R, *numeric*
vectors can be converted into *factors* using the function *cut*.
## I ran a likelihood ratio test, but results() only gives me one comparison.
"... How do I get the *p* values for all of the variables/levels
that were removed in the reduced design?"
This is explained in the help page for `?results` in the
section about likelihood ratio test p-values, but we will restate the
answer here. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the *p* values and
the test statistic (the `stat` column) are values for the test
that removes all of the variables which are present in the full
design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis
that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors
are equal to zero.
The likelihood ratio test *p* values therefore
represent a test of *all the variables and all the levels of factors*
which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for
one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single
comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes
which were tested in the likelihood ratio test).
This is indicated at the top of the results table
with the text, e.g., log2 fold change (MLE): condition C vs A, followed
by, LRT p-value: '~ batch + condition' vs '~ batch'.
This indicates that the *p* value is for the likelihood ratio test of
*all the variables and all the levels*, while the log fold change is a single
comparison from among those variables and levels.
See the help page for *results* for more details.
## What are the exact steps performed by DESeq()?
See the manual page for *DESeq*, which links to the
subfunctions which are called in order, where complete details are
listed. Also you can read the three steps listed in the
[DESeq2 model](#theory) in this document.
## Is there an official Galaxy tool for DESeq2?
Yes. The repository for the DESeq2 tool is
<https://github.com/galaxyproject/tools-iuc/tree/master/tools/deseq2>
and a link to its location in the Tool Shed is
<https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/deseq2/d983d19fbbab>.
## I want to benchmark DESeq2 comparing to other DE tools.
One aspect which can cause problems for comparison is that, by default,
DESeq2 outputs `NA` values for adjusted *p* values based on
independent filtering of genes which have low counts.
This is a way for the DESeq2 to give extra
information on why the adjusted *p* value for this gene is not small.
Additionally, *p* values can be set to `NA` based on extreme
count outlier detection. These `NA` values should be considered
*negatives* for purposes of estimating sensitivity and specificity. The
easiest way to work with the adjusted *p* values in a benchmarking
context is probably to convert these `NA` values to 1:
```{r convertNA, eval=FALSE}
res$padj <- ifelse(is.na(res$padj), 1, res$padj)
```
## I have trouble installing DESeq2 on Ubuntu/Linux...
"*I try to install DESeq2 using biocLite(), but I get an error trying to
install the R packages XML and/or RCurl:*"
`ERROR: configuration failed for package XML`
`ERROR: configuration failed for package RCurl`
You need to install the following devel versions of packages using
your standard package manager, e.g. `sudo apt-get install` or
`sudo apt install`
* libxml2-dev
* libcurl4-openssl-dev
# Acknowledgments
We have benefited in the development of DESeq2 from the help and
feedback of many individuals, including but not limited to:
The Bionconductor Core Team,
Alejandro Reyes, Andrzej Oles, Aleksandra Pekowska, Felix Klein,
Nikolaos Ignatiadis (IHW),
Anqi Zhu (apeglm),
Joseph Ibrahim (apeglm),
Vince Carey,
Owen Solberg,
Ruping Sun,
Devon Ryan,
Steve Lianoglou, Jessica Larson, Christina Chaivorapol, Pan Du, Richard Bourgon,
Willem Talloen,
Elin Videvall, Hanneke van Deutekom,
Todd Burwell,
Jesse Rowley,
Igor Dolgalev,
Stephen Turner,
Ryan C Thompson,
Tyr Wiesner-Hanks,
Konrad Rudolph,
David Robinson,
Mingxiang Teng,
Mathias Lesche,
Sonali Arora,
Jordan Ramilowski,
Ian Dworkin,
Bjorn Gruning,
Ryan McMinds,
Paul Gordon,
Leonardo Collado Torres,
Enrico Ferrero,
Peter Langfelder.
# Session info
```{r sessionInfo}
sessionInfo()
```
# References
|