/usr/share/doc/ghostscript-doc/Ps-style.htm is in ghostscript-doc 9.05~dfsg-0ubuntu4.5.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 | <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<title>Ghostscript PostScript coding guidelines</title>
<!-- $Id$ -->
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="gs.css" title="Ghostscript Style">
</head>
<body>
<!-- [1.0 begin visible header] ============================================ -->
<!-- [1.1 begin headline] ================================================== -->
<h1>Ghostscript PostScript coding guidelines</h1>
<!-- [1.1 end headline] ==================================================== -->
<!-- [1.2 begin table of contents] ========================================= -->
<h2>Table of contents</h2>
<blockquote><ul>
<li><a href="#Summary">Summary of the coding guidelines</a>
<li><a href="#Introduction">Introduction</a>
<li><a href="#PS_features">Use of PostScript language features</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#Restrictions">Restrictions</a>
<li><a href="#Protection">Protection</a>
<li><a href="#Standard_constructions">Standard constructions</a>
</ul>
<li><a href="#File_structuring">File structuring</a>
<li><a href="#Commenting">Commenting</a>
<li><a href="#Formatting">Formatting</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#Indentation">Indentation</a>
<li><a href="#Spaces">Spaces</a>
</ul>
<li><a href="#Naming">Naming</a>
<li><a href="#Miscellany">Miscellany</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#Non_standard_operators">Some useful non-standard operators</a>
<li><a href="#Useful_procedures">Some useful procedures</a>
<li><a href="#Other">Other</a>
</ul>
</ul></blockquote>
<!-- [1.2 end table of contents] =========================================== -->
<!-- [1.3 begin hint] ====================================================== -->
<p>
For other information, see the <a href="Readme.htm">Ghostscript
overview</a>.
<!-- [1.3 end hint] ======================================================== -->
<hr>
<!-- [1.0 end visible header] ============================================== -->
<!-- [2.0 begin contents] ================================================== -->
<h2><a name="Summary"></a>Summary of the coding guidelines</h2>
<ul>
<li>Don't store into literals.
<li>Use <code>loop</code> to create a block with multiple exits.
<li>Use a dictionary or an array for multi-way switches.
<li>Start every file with a copyright notice, the file name, and a one-line
summary.
<li>Comment every procedure with the arguments and result, and with the
function of the procedure unless it's obvious.
<li>Comment the stack contents ad lib, and particularly at the beginning of
every loop body.
<li>Indent every 2 spaces.
<li>Always put { at the end of a line, and } at the beginning of a line,
unless the contents are very short.
<li>Always put spaces between adjacent tokens.
<li>Use only lower-case letters and digits for names, or Vienna style names,
except for an initial "." for names only used within a single file.
<li>Don't allocate objects in heavily used code.
<li>Consider factoring out code into a procedure if it is used more than
once.
</ul>
<hr>
<h2><a name="Introduction"></a>Introduction</h2>
<p>
The many rules that Ghostscript's code follows almost everywhere are meant
to produce code that is easy to read. It's important to observe them as
much as possible in order to maintain a consistent style, but if you find a
rule getting in your way or producing ugly-looking results once in a while,
it's OK to break it.
<hr>
<h2><a name="PS_features"></a>Use of PostScript language features</h2>
<h3><a name="Restrictions"></a>Restrictions</h3>
<p>
If you need to store a value temporarily, don't write into a literal in the
code, as in this fragment to show a character given the character code:
<blockquote><pre>
( ) dup 0 4 -1 roll put show
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
Instead, allocate storage for it:
<blockquote><pre>
1 string dup 0 4 -1 roll put show
</pre></blockquote>
<h3><a name="Protection"></a>Protection</h3>
<p>
If an object is never supposed to change, use <code>readonly</code> to
make it read-only. This applies especially to permanently allocated objects
such as constant strings or dictionaries.
<p>
During initialization, and occasionally afterwards, it may be necessary to
store into a read-only dictionary, or to store a pointer to a dictionary in
local VM into a dictionary in global VM. The operators
<code>.forceput</code> and <code>.forceundef</code> are available for
this purpose. To make these operators inaccessible to ordinary programs,
they are removed from <code>systemdict</code> at the end of
initialization: system code that uses them should always use
<code>bind</code> and <code>odef</code> (or
<code>executeonly</code>) to make uses of them inaccessible as well.
<h3><a name="Standard_constructions"></a>Standard constructions</h3>
<h4>Multi-way conditionals</h4>
<p>
If you write a block of code with more than about 3 exit points, the usual
way to do it would be like this:
<blockquote><pre>
{
... {
...1
} {
... {
...2
} {
... {
...3
} {
...4
} ifelse
} ifelse
} ifelse
}
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
However, this causes the 4 logically somewhat parallel code blocks to be
indented differently, and as the indentation increases, it becomes harder to
see the structure visually. As an alternative, you can do it this way:
<blockquote><pre>
{ % The loop doesn't actually loop: it just provides a common exit.
... {
...1
exit
} if
... {
...2
exit
} if
... {
...3
exit
} if
...4
exit
} loop
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
Don't forget the final exit, to prevent the loop from actually looping.
<h4>Switches</h4>
<p>
Use a dictionary or an array of procedures to implement a 'switch', rather
than a series of conditionals, if there are more than about 3 cases. For
example, rather than:
<blockquote><pre>
dup /a eq {
pop ...a
} {
dup /b eq {
pop ...b
} {
dup /c eq {
pop ...c
} {
...x
} ifelse
} ifelse
} ifelse
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
(or using the loop/exit construct suggested above), consider:
<blockquote><pre>
/xyzdict mark
/a {...a} bind
/b {...b} bind
/c {...c} bind
.dicttomark readonly def
...
//xyzdict 1 index .knownget {
exch pop exec
} {
...x
} ifelse
</pre></blockquote>
<hr>
<h2><a name="File_structuring"></a>File structuring</h2>
<p>
Every code file should start with comments containing
<ol>
<li>a copyright notice;
<li>the name of the file in the form of an RCS Id:
<blockquote><pre>
% $Id: filename.ps $
</pre></blockquote>
<li>a very brief summary (preferably only one line) of what the file
contains.
</ol>
<p>
If you create a file by copying the beginning of another file, be sure to
update the copyright year and change the file name.
<hr>
<h2><a name="Commenting"></a>Commenting</h2>
<p>
If a file has well-defined functional sections, put a comment at the
beginning of each section to describe its purpose or function.
<p>
Put a comment before every procedure to describe what the procedure does,
unless it's obvious or the procedure's function is defined by the PLRM. In
case of doubt, don't assume it's obvious. If the procedure may execute a
deliberate 'stop' or 'exit' not enclosed in 'stopped' or a loop
respectively, that should be mentioned. However, information about the
arguments and results should go in the argument and result comment
(described just below) if possible, not the functional comment.
<p>
Put a comment on every procedure to describe the arguments and results:
<blockquote><pre>
/hypot { % <num1> <num2> hypot <real>
dup mul exch dup mul add sqrt
} def
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
There is another commenting style that some people prefer to the above:
<blockquote><pre>
/hypot { % num1 num2 --> realnum
dup mul exch dup mul add sqrt
} def
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
We have adopted the first style for consistency with Adobe's documentation,
but we recognize that there are technical arguments for and against both
styles, and might consider switching some time in the future. If you have
strong feelings either way, please make your opinion known to
<code>gs-devel@ghostscript.com</code>.
<p>
Put comments describing the stack contents wherever you think they will be
helpful; put such a comment at the beginning of every loop body unless you
have a good reason not to.
<p>
When you change a piece of code, do <em>not</em> include a comment with your
name or initials. Also, do <em>not</em> retain the old code in a comment,
unless you consider it essential to explain something about the new code; in
that case, retain as little as possible. (CVS logs do both of these things
better than manual editing.) However, if you make major changes in a
procedure or a file, you may put your initials, the date, and a brief
comment at the head of the procedure or file respectively.
<hr>
<h2><a name="Formatting"></a>Formatting</h2>
<h3><a name="Indentation"></a>Indentation</h3>
<p>
Indent 2 spaces per indentation level. You may use tabs at the left margin
for indentation, with 1 tab = 8 spaces, but you should not use tabs anywhere
else, except to place comments.
<p>
Indent { } constructs like this:
<blockquote><pre>
... {
...
} {
...
} ...
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
If the body of a conditional or loop is no more than about 20 characters,
you can put the entire construct on a single line if you want:
<blockquote><pre>
... { ... } if
</pre></blockquote>
rather than
<blockquote><pre>
... {
...
} if
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
There is another indentation style that many people prefer to the above:
<blockquote><pre>
...
{ ...
}
{ ...
} ...
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
We have adopted the first style for consistency with our C code, but we
recognize that there are technical arguments for and against both styles,
and might consider switching some time in the future. If you have strong
feelings either way, please make your opinion known to
<code>gs-devel@ghostscript.com</code>.
<h3><a name="Spaces"></a>Spaces</h3>
<p>
Always put spaces between two adjacent tokens, even if this isn't strictly
required. E.g.,
<blockquote><pre>
/Halftone /Category findresource
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
not
<blockquote><pre>
/Halftone/Category findresource
</pre></blockquote>
<hr>
<h2><a name="Naming"></a>Naming</h2>
<p>
All names should consist only of letters and digits, possibly with an
initial ".", except for names drawn from the PostScript or PDF reference
manual, which must be capitalized as in the manual. In general, an initial
"." should be used for those and only those names that are not defined in a
private dictionary but that are meant to be used only in the file where they
are defined.
<p>
For edits to existing code, names made up of multiple words should not use
any punctuation, or capitalization, to separate the words, again except for
names that must match a specification. For new code, you may use this
convention, or you may use the "Vienna" convention of capitalizing the first
letter of words, e.g., <code>readSubrs</code> rather than
<code>readsubrs</code>. If you use the Vienna convention, function names
should start with an upper case letter, variable names with a lower case
letter. Using the first letter of a variable name to indicate the
variable's type is optional, but if you do it, you should follow existing
codified usage (****** WE NEED A REFERENCE FOR THIS ******).
<hr>
<h2><a name="Miscellany"></a>Miscellany</h2>
<h3><a name="Non_standard_operators"></a>Some useful non-standard
operators</h3>
<dl>
<dt><code><obj1> <obj2> ... <objn> <n> .execn ...</code>
<dd>This executes <code>obj1</code> through <code>objn</code> in that
order, essentially equivalent to
<blockquote><pre>
<obj1> <obj2> ... <objn> <n> array astore {exec} forall
</pre></blockquote>
<p>
except that it doesn't actually create the array.
<dt><code><dict> <key> <b>.knownget</b> <value> true</code>
<dt><code><dict> <key> <b>.knownget</b> false</code>
<dd>This combines <code>known</code> and <code>get</code> in the
obvious way.
<dt><code><name> <proc> odef -</code>
<dd>This defines <code>name</code> as a "pseudo-operator". The value of
<code>name</code> will be executable, will have type
<code>operatortype</code>, and will be executed if it appears directly in
the body of a procedure (like an operator, unlike a procedure), but what
will actually be executed will be <code>proc</code>. In addition, if the
execution of <code>proc</code> is ended prematurely (by
<code>stop</code>, including the <code>stop</code> that is normally
executed when an error occurs, or <code>exit</code>) and the operand and
dictionary stacks are at least as deep as they were when the "operator" was
invoked, the stacks will be cut back to their original depths before the
error is processed. Thus, if pseudo-operator procedures are careful not to
remove any of their operands until they reach a point in execution beyond
which they cannot possibly cause an error, they will behave just like
operators in that the stacks will appear to be unchanged if an error occurs.
</dl>
<h3><a name="Useful_procedures"></a>Some useful procedures</h3>
<dl>
<dt><code><object> <errorname> signalerror -</code>
<dd>Signal an error with the given name and the given "current object".
This does exactly what the interpreter does when an error occurs.
</dl>
<h3><a name="Other"></a>Other</h3>
<p>
If you can avoid it, don't allocate objects (strings, arrays, dictionaries,
gstates, etc.) in commonly used operators or procedures: these will need to
be garbage collected later, slowing down execution. Instead, keep values on
the stack, if you can. The <code>.execn</code> operator discussed above
may be helpful in doing this.
<p>
If you find yourself writing the same stretch of code (more than about half
a dozen tokens) more than once, ask yourself whether it performs a function
that could be made into a procedure.
<!-- [2.0 end contents] ==================================================== -->
<!-- [3.0 begin visible trailer] =========================================== -->
<hr>
<p>
<small>Copyright © 2000-2006 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved.</small>
<p>
This software is provided AS-IS with no warranty, either express or
implied.
This software is distributed under license and may not be copied, modified
or distributed except as expressly authorized under the terms of that
license. Refer to licensing information at http://www.artifex.com/
or contact Artifex Software, Inc., 7 Mt. Lassen Drive - Suite A-134,
San Rafael, CA 94903, U.S.A., +1(415)492-9861, for further information.
<p>
<small>Ghostscript version 9.05, 8 February 2012
<!-- [3.0 end visible trailer] ============================================= -->
</body>
</html>
|